Recent updates to the Exodus viewer have been a little slow in some respects. This is in part hardly surprising – at least one member of the team (Geenz Spad) has been up to his eyeballs in working on the materials processing project. However, other factors – such as real life commitments – have meant that other members of the team have also been unable to focus on the viewer perhaps as much as they would have liked.
As a result of this, both Clix Diesel and Ayamo Nozaki have decided to step aside from lead roles in the project and pass the torch on to others – with Katharine Berry taking over ownership of the project and the role of lead developer. Clix himself made the announcement in an Exodus blog post on Sunday April 21st, which reads:
Hello everyone!
I know it’s been a while since an update but we have some important news to share with you.
I would like to announce Katharine Berry as the new lead developer and owner of the Exodus viewer project!
Exodus has been a passion of Ayamo and myself for just shy of two years now and we have enjoyed leading the project immensely. Originally we built Exodus as a viewer to compliment various Second Life combat scenarios, Exodus has since catered for a wide variety of user and continues to provide a the best viewer experience we possibly can thanks to the skill and dedication of my team. This will never change. Recently we have not been able to focus on viewer development as much as we would like. Ayamo Nozaki will be leaving as our lead developer and passing the torch to Katharine Berry. Katharine is also the ideal candidate to hand ownership of the project, as Ayamo and I cannot spare the time to do so any longer.
Thank you everyone, from Ayamo and me, it’s been a blast!
Exodus remains one of the three viewers I most frequently use, depending upon what I’m doing in-world, so I look forward to seeing what this hand-over brings; I also wish Clix and Ayamo the best for their future endeavours, in-world and elsewhere.
An updated beta viewer was released on April 19th (3.5.1.274264, with release notes here), which contains a range of updates, including several for SSB/A. Speaking at the TPV Developer meeting on Friday, 19th April, Oz Linden indicated that the current plan from the Lab is that this is likely to be the last beta viewer release for the SSB/A code unless a major blocker shows up. Assuming this doesn’t happen, then it is more than likely the SSB/A will move to the SL viewer release channel and arrive as a viewer update towards the middle of week 17 (week commencing Monday, 22nd April), which should hopefully be an automated update for most users on the SL viewer, given the majority appear to keep that option active on their viewers.
Given us, it is liable that we’ll start seeing more TPVs updates appearing in the near future – and people using TPVs are going to need to start installing and using those updates rather than remaining with older versions of their viewer if they are to avoid the “grey people” syndrome as the server-side of SSB/A is deployed.
Users will need to update to a version of their preferred viewer supporting SSB/A as they are made available if they are to avoid seeing grey people once the deployment of the server-side of SSB/A commences
Server-side Deployment
The precise means by which the server-side will by deployed is still not absolutely clear. As noted a number of times in this blog, Nyx Linden is hoping that things will progress somewhat cautiously, possibly starting with a set of “carefully selected and constrained regions on Agni” as the viewer code reaches the SL release viewer. This still appears to be the case, but it is possible that it will not – as Nyx has previously hinted – roll through the Release Candidate channels.
“I don’t know whether it will go through the normal RC process,” Oz Linden commented at the TPV Developer meeting, “Because it’s not actually a server software change; it’s a configuration change, so they don’t need to deploy it through the RC progression. All they have to say is, ‘Yes, throw the switch!'”
If this approach is taken, it’s currently not clear whether or not it will require a region restart.
In terms of time frames as to when this might happen, things are similarly unclear at this point – a lot depends on how well the testing on the selected Agni regions progresses. However, Oz suggested that the time frame in which the “switch may be thrown” to be anything between 2 and 6-8 weeks from when the viewer-side code appears. His analogy was that of a bell curve, wherein the switch-over could occur at the top of the curve – but could, if circumstances dictate, occur at either end of the curve.
Communications
It is still hoped that there will be a concerted effort on the Lab’s part to communicate server-side baking ahead of any server-side flipping of switches. A blog post is apparently in preparation, which should go out when the SSB/A code is issued in the release viewer; whether this will be supported by other means of communicating the changes is unclear.
However, communications on the whole is not easy – even with the TPVs also liable to be spreading the word through blogs, etc., (as Firestorm have already). This is because even with the official blog, TPV blogs and blogs such as this one, the vast majority of SL users do not read blogs.
Matters are also further complicated by the fact that there are over 1700 different viewer strings which are used to connect to SL (even if not on a daily basis). These not only include the official viewer and current versions of TPV-registered viewers, but also many instances of older versions of TPVs, Snowglobe (1.x) based viewers, several versions of the official 1.x viewer (some of which date back over 5 years), viewers which are not registered with the TPV directory, self-compiled versions of various viewers, and so on.
As such, whatever the effort made to communicate the arrival of SSB/A is liable to be missed by a good number of users and people are going to find themselves facing grey avatars as a result of the switch to SSB/A, because many of these additional viewer strings will not have the necessary viewer-side code. This inevitably means that there is going to be some disruption and upset. While this in turn doesn’t mean that attempts to communicate the coming change shouldn’t be made – but it does mean that even with the best efforts of the Lab and TPVs combined in communicating SSB/A, there is going to be an outcry. So anything all those who are aware of the upcoming changes can do to communicate it to others – particularly when there is a visible log post from LL on the matter which can be referenced – can only help lessen the volume of that outcry.
On Tuesday April 16th, the SLS Main channel received Monty Linden’s HTTP updates, which were deployed to BlueSteel and LeTigre in week 15, after having previously been on Magnum for testing – release notes
On Wednesday April 17th, the three Release Candidate channels (BlueSteel, LeTigre and Magnum) all received the same package after a planned deployment to BlueSteel and LeTigre had to be abandoned due to scheduling issues. The package deployed included the new server-side LSL Animation Override capabilities, including a fix for BUG-2164 wherein the new capabilities could conflict with built-in animation poses in chairs, etc., as discussed in my week 15 updates. The Magnum release are linked to for reference.
Following the SLS Main channel deployment there were a number of reports of significantly higher ping rates with regions being reported on the deployment thread, which prompted Monty Linden to comment, “There was a significant networking event today that has cleared. Back to normal at this point…” Other than this, and reports of animation issues, which again may have been the result of server-side work, the deployments appear to have rolled-out smoothly and without significant issue.
SL Viewer Summary
Materials processing: the project viewer gained a further update on April 17th, with the deployment of release 3.5.1.274082, which includes bug fixes and some work on alpha masks. The bug fixes are hard to relate to public MATBUG JIRA items, as they all reference NORSPEC issues, which is LL’s internal materials JIRA reference. A further update to the project viewer is anticipated on either Friday 19th April or Monday, April 22nd.
Materials project viewer: second update now available, third update to follow soon.
Server-side Baking / Appearance: speaking at the OpenDev meeting on Wednesday 17th April, Oz Linden indicated that SSB will have at least “one more spin” in the beta viewer before appearing in the SL release viewer. A further update was made to the SL development viewer (3.5.2.274273) on Thursday April 18th, so the beta update is liable to be appearing very shortly.
Further viewer updates: once SSB moves to the release viewer, it is likely that the FMODex update will move into the beta viewer; this should also include a fix for the issue with the Mac version of the viewer wherein it crashes whenever headphones are unplugged (and which, incidentally, is the most widely reported crash issue with the Firestorm viewer).
Aditi Issues
While Aditi has received attention recently in order to overcome logging-in and inventory issues, it still as a way to go before everything is “fixed”. Commenting on this at the Beta Server meeting on April 18th, Monty Linden commented, “[The] beta grid is going to get some attention in the login/inv area. But [I] don’t have a date. The problems are (mostly) understood.”
The password-change-to-update-your-Aditi-inventory might be changing as things are looked at and further updated / corrected. Commenting on this at the Beta Server meeting as well, Simon Linden said, “That trigger was done as a quick-and-easy way to stop having to ask a Linden to import your account.”
In discussing the asset system and inventories, Simon re-iterated that while there is a central asset system, it is really one very large storage system, and that, “The real magic isn’t the asset system, it’s your inventory database. Your inventory is what says which assets are yours.” It is syncing the inventory databases between Aditi and Agni which had become an issue, and also somewhat labour-intensive for LL but for the password change trigger.
Monty, with tongue firmly in cheek, suggested an alternative as to how the inventory / asset system works: “Inventory is recorded onto Post-ItTM notes and optically scanned at rez time.” Which, on reflection, is likely to confirm suspicions many have had!
Other Items in brief
Monty Linden
HTTP Work
The next round of HTTP work is still being defined within the Lab. When asked what this might comprise, Monty replied, “Mesh download is going to get attention. It currently shotguns our services without really performing well.”
He went on, “Might do an experiment or two with pipelining. – but no promises, still setting priorities.”
It is the last remark which is important: things are still being decided in terms of further work and priorities where HTTP work is concerned. This was further underlined again by Monty when he indicated that “phase 3” of the work (the immediate follow-on to the last block of work) may well be “all viewer-side”, given that the initial work (texture fetching) was primarily viewer-side work and the last batch of work was exclusively server-side. So this appears to be a case of wait and see which route he and the Lab opt to take.
Advanced Creation Tools Permissions
July saw the launch of the first phase of the Advanced Creation Tools, also referred to as experience tools. Following problems with an initial deployment of the tools in June, which resulted them being exploited as a means of griefing, the “first phase” of the release saw the tools implemented with existing permissions system in place, with the intention of updating the permissions system to allow the tools to be more fully used “in the future”. Work on the new permissions system was stalled for a number of months, but has recently been getting more attention and work. The current situation appears to be that the permissions system may well be ready, but those working on the project are still, “sorting out how and when that’s going to be made available.”
Diagonal Region Rendering Issues
While fixes have been deployed to assist with issues with regions sometimes taking a long time to correctly handshake and cache with one another following a restart, this issue of regions which are diagonally opposite one another sometimes failing to render remains. Simon Linden had indicated that a potential fix for this issue was with QA as long ago as week 8; however it appears that the work may have hit problems or actually be stalled. In replying to a comment on the forum deployment thread relating to the issue, Maestro Linden replied with a simple, “Correct, that bug has not been fixed”.
Ahead of the upcoming Firestorm release – which will be available Real SoonTM, (sorry, I can’t say when as Jessica would douse me in catnip and set the moggies on me 🙂 ), Jessica has been busy on a new set of video tutorials for users.
Some of the videos are specific to the upcoming release, and one is for those still using Phoenix and who wish to make the switch to Firestorm. This is something which has been covered before in Firestorm tutorials (and something I’ve attempted to cover myself in the past), but as things have moved on somewhat since those days, the new video has been produced.
The Firestorm 4.4.0 video cover features which are both new to the upcoming release, and which are updated in the upcoming release in comparison with earlier releases of the viewer – such as with object de-rendering, as per the video below.
Second Life Server (Main) Channel Week 16 Deployment
On Tuesday April 16th, the SLS Main channel received Monty Linden’s HTTP updates, which were deployed to BlueSteel and LeTigre in week 15, after having previously been on Magnum for testing. These updates can be briefly summarised as:
More complete and more correct headers on texture and mesh fetches – these should ensure the viewer is better able to handle objects as they are downloaded to it
Keepalive connections for some HTTP-based services
On Wednesday 17th April, all three RC channels should receive the same update package. This comprises the server-side LSL Animiation Override capabilities, this time complete with a fix for BUG 2164, wherein the new capabilities could conflict with built-in animation poses in chairs, etc., as discussed in my week 15 updates. This deployment additionally includes the slight region performance improvement when there are no pathfinding characters present. Release notes are available
Originally, a separate package had been in preparation for deployment to BlueSteel / LeTigre, but this has had to be postponed due to “last minute scheduling issues”, according to Simon Linden when speaking at the Simulator User Group meeting on Tuesday April 16th. While attempts were apparently being made to get an alternative project into RC, it was “down to the wire to complete testing” at the time of the Simulator UG meeting, and an announcement confirming BlueSteel and LeTigre would receive the same package as Magnum was posted to the deployment thread not long after the meeting finished.
Object Return from Region Edge
A further update which should reach all three RC channels on Wednesday April 17th is the fix for https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/BUG-313 (estate tools do not return objects between 255 and 256m ) / https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/BUG-2021 (Auto-return not affecting objects at 256m), which see objects right on the region edge sometimes slipping into a “limbo” which prevented them from being returned either under Auto-return or when using estate tools.
There is some concern that the fix, once deployed, may not correct all issues. However, until it is deployed, there’s no actual way of knowing – so further updates may well be following.
Region Crossings
Since the deployment of the fix for BUG-1814 making region crossings in vehicles has been seen as noticeably better by many people. However, some have noted problems which appeared to be linked to crossings between regions running on different simulator versions, and this was discussed at length at a recent Simulator User Group meeting.
Kitto Flora suggested the problem was not so much with different simulator versions, but due to network traffic, commenting, “It’s directly related to your Net traffic rate when you cross. If its 500k – fail maybe 20% of time … If its 50k it rarely fails.”
While I have been flying extensively over the past week, particularly over Blake Sea and the south-lying regions and over parts of Nautilus, I’ve not been monitoring net traffic during my flights – although I do reduce Draw Distance when flying and tend to shunt graphics quality down to medium-low – so cannot comment on Kitto’s observations. I can however state that when I did encounter problems beyond the expected temporary loss-of-control / rubber-banding – such as my camera skewing off to once side of my aircraft as shown below – it always coincided with a move between one simulator version and another, and never between regions on the same simulator version. So I guess more test and observations are due on my part after this week’s deployments!
Flight testing region crossings: when moving between regions running on different simulator versions, I invariably encountered greater issues (such as the camera being shunt, as shown above) than when crossing between regions on the same simulator (note the chat console reports, lower left and notifications. top right).
The discussion on region crossings raised additional questions. One of these was whether or not the speed one crosses between regions made any difference. Simon Linden replied:
Your speed in-world shouldn’t have any effect on actually making it or not, but faster crossings will show the errors in predicting where objects will be more. Such as the rubber band effect when crossing … your viewer sees you going a certain speed, and keeps moving you that way, while you hit the crossing, get some lag as the data is transferred to the new region, and you’re stuck into the world, then sling-shot back to the new position.
Questions / comments were also raised around the subject of region crossings and idle regions: specifically whether crossing into an idle region was subject to additional delay as the region “woke up” and that some have experienced issues with regions which are apparently idling being unresponsive to new child avies, and people “bounce” off the border prior to being able to cross. Responding to both the question and the comments, Simon said:
You actually shouldn’t ever be able to do that. It won’t be idling if you can see into it … Also, remember idle regions are not dead, they [are] just are running at a slower frame rate, just like loaded down regions do.
Missing Prims
There are currently no updates on the “missing prims” situation which has been previously reported in this blog, and which has grown markedly more apparent since the last set of interest list updates.
Andrew Linden was not at the Simulator User Group meeting on Tuesday April 16th to discuss either, but is almost certain to be asked at the Beta Server meeting on Thursday 18th April, if he attends.
There’s no movement on the release viewer, and likely won’t be until Server-side Baking moves to it, having finally arrived in the Beta viewer on April 12th (see below). The Development viewer was also updated on April 12th, with the release of version 3.5.2.273873, which includes both SSB and CHUI updates.
Materials Project
An update to the materials processing project viewer was released on Friday April 12th – 3.5.1.273855 – with a series of bug fixes included in it. There are further updates on the way, with the next release due around the middle of week 16, which will have further bug fixes and, hopefully, some Alpha mode updates as well. Commenting on the latter at the Content Creation User Group on Monday April 15th, Geenz Spad said, “Actually just got normal maps working on alpha blended objects, and trying to get everything else working on them as well.”
One fix currently pending is that for MATBUG-16, Changing one material, or setting causes another material texture to be lost. This is an issue which can happen as a result of several factors. For example, setting a normal or specular map for one face of an object can result in maps already applied to other faces of an object either being removed or replaced with the most recently added map. The same issue can occur when applying a setting such as glossiness to one face of an object using materials.
MATBUG-16 demonstrated using 2 diffuse maps and their associated normal maps. A prim previously set with a stone diffuse map and associated normal map has a green diffuse map applied to one face – the normal map is unaffected (l). However, when the normal map is updated, it changes for the entire prim (r)
This problem doesn’t happen every time mixed materials elements are used on object faces, but can occur when adding multiple materials elements to an object in quick succession. “There are a couple of problems there,” Oz Linden said while discussing the problem at the Open-source Dev meeting on Monday, April 15th. “The updates to the server are happening faster than it will allow, which is one problem. The other is that the updates are not applied locally as smoothly as they should be.”
Tonya Souther, who re-worked the Build floater for materials processing added, “Yeah, that bug has been driving me batty ever since I first did the UI. And I think that’s due to the design of the system…the UI has to ask the server for the material separately, and apply the values retrieved from it to the UI components when they arrive. That ‘s the only way that the UI won’t get out of sync with the actual values stored on the server … I just need to find a way to make the delay not apparent to the user and handle changes that come along in that period.”
For now, the answer seems to be that if you experience any issues with normal / specular maps vanishing or being replaced when using multiple maps / effects across different faces of an object, then allow a short pause between adding the various maps / effects so the viewer and server can keep pace with your work.
Elsewhere, Geenz Spad, one of the architects of the materials processing system, has started a new blog series on materials, Second Life Materials: A Content Creator’s Guide. In the first part of the series, he answers the question, What’s a material? In the next installment, he promises to take a look at some of the tools which can be used to create normal maps.
Server-side Baking
The viewer Server-side Baking /Appearance code reached the Beta viewer in week 15 with the release of 3.5.1.273869 on April 12th. The initial stats apparently show it is doing well, crash-wise, but the status of incoming bugs is currently unclear. However, it still looks as if the code is currently on course for around a two-week stint in the beta viewer prior to moving to the release viewer channel.
A key bug fix for the system has been SUN-57, which now allows multiple layer of clothing to be worn / swapped on regions which are not running the SSB server-side code (on Aditi), which removes a potential road block from server-side code deployment (remembering that for a time during the server-side deployment, updated viewers must support both the old and new avatar baking services).
The SUN-57 issue, as defined by Whirly Fizzle, which saw issues occurring in avatar baking using a viewer supporting the upcoming “new” SSB/A service and changing outfits on a region only supporting the current avatar baking process, which saw outfits and skins failing to update correctly following changes. Reportedly now fixed
There are still no definitive timescales for any Agni deployment for SSB/A. As previously reported in this blog, it is still unlikely that any major deployment operations will commence prior to the SSB cove reaching the release viewer.
Other Items
I recently blogged about Oculus Rift and speculation as to whether it would see use in Second Life. On April 7th, Jon Brouchoud blogged on why SL would be a “killer app” for the headset – an article which has seen widespread reprinting / referral in SL / Opensim related blogs. While I have no particular opinion either way as to Oculus Rift / Second life (although how it will work with the SL UI does intrigue me), I have to admit the following video demonstrating Oculus Rift had me smiling from ear-to-ear. It’s not really related to Second Life, but it is well-worth watching.
Recent updates to the Exodus viewer have been a little slow in some respects. This is in part hardly surprising – at least one member of the team (Geenz Spad) has been up to his eyeballs in working on the materials processing project. However, other factors – such as real life commitments – have meant that other members of the team have also been unable to focus on the viewer perhaps as much as they would have liked.
Inara Pey: Living in a Modemworld 