Of blogs and blogging

Over the last couple of days, I’ve had the opportunity to re-visit LL’s recent call to bloggers through commenting on a couple of fellow blogger’s posts on the subject – namely Mariis’ Explorations and Nalates Urriah. Mariis and I are pretty much on the same page on things – as our exchange demonstrates; Nalates admits herself perplexed as to the derisive reaction of some bloggers (and I count myself among them), and I’ve attempted to provide explanation which actually formed the basis of what I’m about to say here.

These exchanges have been part of a wider cogitation on the matter, and as such, I’d like to put a further alternative idea to Linden Lab on the matter of working with the blogging community. I’ll leave it to TPTB at LL (assuming they’re still reading this blog!) to decide on the usefulness / applicability of the idea. In putting it forward, I’ll also state that I’ve little doubt the broad thrust of what I’m outlining here may well have been stated elsewhere and well ahead of me – so I apologise to those that have raised it first if I’m repeating things.

The idea is this: rather than seek to solicit blog posts on an exclusive basis, LL should perhaps consider looking to reprint suitable blog articles within their own web space. This may well be slightly more labour-intensive for them (although given by their own admission they do have staff routinely perusing and reading blogs, so the overhead shouldn’t be that big an issue) – but there would be significant benefits, in particular:

  • They show that they are willing to work on a more collaborative basis with the community
  • They are free to cherry-pick that articles they wish to reproduce in their pages without let or hindrance, and free from controversial “public” submission guidelines
  • The official blogs stand to get fresh content
  • They don’t directly impact on indvidual bloggers’ freedom to cover SL or their ability to enjoy the drect benefit of having their own words appearing on their own pages.

Such an approach stands to generate a lot of goodwill from the blogging community. For a start, who would not feel somewhat flattered upon the receipt of an e-mail from LL requesting permission to reprint an article that has taken time and effort to put together? The e-mail needn’t be too hard to put together either; I’d suggest something like: “Dear X, we recently read your blog article on Y and found it to be both informative and entertaining. We would like to reproduce it in under the Guest Blogger section of our website. You will of course receive full credit for the work, together with a link to your own website. If you are happy for us to include your article in our pages, please reply to this e-mail within Z days, together with a 3-sentence biography relating to yourself. We will, of course, inform you when we do reprint the article”. Or words to that effect. I think it fair to say that such an e-mail would give a person quite a feeling of recognition / involvement.

It would also give LL the freedom to reproduce articles they like and which fit their overall requirements. Any concerns relating to wording, etc., could be taken care of through the use of a disclaimer printed ahead of the article, vis: “The views and opinions in the following piece are those of the named author. They do not represent the views or opinion of Linden Research Inc., its employees or agents.”  (or again, something similar). Granted, it’s not 100% watertight, but given LL are retaining a free hand in selecting the items they might wish to reproduce, one suspects contentious or deliberately controversial articles are not going to be among their likely candidates for reprinting.

And on the matter of exclusivity itself: would LL really be losing out to any great degree in foregoing the requirement? I actually don’t think so. I rather suspect (and with respect to all) that, with the exception of a handful of high-profile blogs, LL has a much broader potential readership in the form of the entire SL community bouncing in and out of their website via individual Dashboards than the majority of bloggers enjoy on an individual basis. As such, LL aren’t likely to miss out that much because some have read the article ahead of it appearing in the official website.

All-in-all, and subject to my not having missed something in the equation, this would seem to be a win / win situation for all concerned. Linden Lab get to freshen-up their own blogs and are seen to be positively connecting with the community; bloggers get to keep on doing what they do best without diverting their attention away from directly nurturing their own blogs, whilst also having the freedom to turn out posts that might well be suited to being picked-up by the Lab.

9 thoughts on “Of blogs and blogging

  1. Yes! I suggested this very idea on twitter the day this issue blew up.

    Guess how I started to make a name for myself in the SLblogosphere? Hamlet Au read my blog and occasionally he would link to something I wrote on New World Notes. I got new readers that way and it encouraged me to blog more. Eventually that led to a job writing for Hamlet. I am the first to agree that exposure on a high traffic blog has great value.

    LL could easily find any number of interesting posts by talented writers today. If people knew they had a chance at appearing on the SL blog I am sure there would be an increase in the number and type of posts LL seeks. There is a win/win in this and I would love to see such an idea implemented.

    Like

    1. I’ve been neglecting Twitter over the last few months (although this is going to change shortly, with the start of the 2012 F1 season – I’m a terrible petrol (gas) junkie!), so I’ll tick you with the credit for the idea :).

      It is the one aspect of the situation I do regret: LL took a stomping over their original forum post, so the bridge may, sadly, be well and truly burned. I hope that’s not the case, and LL will have cause to revisit the idea.

      Like

      1. I don’t need credit. I think its more a case of “great minds think alike.”

        I was really surprised at how angry people got honestly. I tossed off my cranky post in about 5 minutes and didn’t give it much thought. Then I drove to work and in the 20 minutes between hitting publish and arriving at my desk it seemed as if all hell broke loose.

        There are plenty of people who are happy to take LL up on the original offer. If that works for both parties — great. I still wish LL would produce a moderated feed of the huge amount of excellent SL writing that already exists.

        Like

  2. Starting with Catherine, the Lab began to highlight third-party blog-posts, linking to them on the blog and on twitter. For myself, I found Catherine to be the most responsive and communicative comms manager that the Lab had had up to that point.

    Like

  3. Yes, I like this idea too, and builing on the idea of Chestnut and others, I’d also like to see LL create some sort of topic/use case based directory. When I started out in SL, I turned to the blogsphere to find information – information from users often also has the advantage of being less biased, and even when blogposts point to more critical issues many bloggers and their commentators come up with possible solutions (and often faster than LL). LL could then reserve its right to “feature” posts as it sees fit in a common feed.

    Like

  4. I will add my vote for this idea too.
    My only real objection to LL’s suggestion was that they wanted not only exclusive rights but the right to edit without clearing the final version with the person who’s name would be attached! This idea gets around that neatly.

    Like

  5. A hybrid of this idea has already been tried, Linden Lab sought out people to blog for them on fashion, games, places, Halloween and I didn’t see any complaints about that, those who were approached probably felt flattered.

    That practice probably led to LL deciding to issue their call for bloggers. The exclusivity clause should be looked at again, there are plenty of posts around worthy of a wider audience.

    Like

Comments are closed.