Space Sunday: a Martian sandwich

ExoMars unofficial logo
ExoMars unofficial logo (credit: DLR)

If all goes according to plan, at 09:31 GMT on Monday March 14th, a Russian Proton launcher is scheduled to lift-off from the Baikonaur Cosmodrome Kazakhstan, sending the first part of the European ExoMars mission on its way to Mars.

With its suite of high-tech instruments, the Trace Gas Orbiter (TGO) should arrive at the Red Planet on October 19th, 2016, after a journey of 496 million kilometres (308 million miles). While Its main mission is to photograph the Red Planet and analyse its air, the TGO is also carrying a small Mars lander, dubbed Schiaparelli, after the man who first thought he saw canali (as in “groves” or “channels”) on Mars in the 1870s, and thus inadvertently sparked the entire “canals on Mars mythos.

March 11th 2016: the Proton rocket with TGO and EDM on-board is hoisted to the vertical position at its launch pad in the Baikonaur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan
March 11th 2016: the Proton rocket with TGO and EDM on-board is hoisted to the vertical position at its launch pad in the Baikonaur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan

A key goal for the TGO mission is to analyse the methane gas which has frequently been detected on Mars by various missions. Methane can either be generated in a biological process, such as microbes decomposing organic matter, or geological ones involving chemical processes in hot liquid water under the surface. However, it also tends to be broken down by  ultraviolet radiation within a few hundred years, so for it to be detected at all on Mars means whatever is producing it is liable to be an active process, and identifying what that process actually is – organic or inorganic – is a crucial part of furthering our understanding of Mars, and could have major ramifications for future missions.

“TGO will be like a big nose in space,” according to Jorge Vago, an ExoMars project scientist. “It will analyse Mars’ methane in more detail than any previous mission and try to determine its origins.”

In addition, TGO will monitor seasonal changes in Mars’ atmospheric composition and temperature in order to create and refine detailed models of the Martian atmosphere. Its instruments will also map the subsurface hydrogen to a depth of a metre, with improved spatial resolution compared with previous measurements. This could reveal deposits of water-ice hidden just below the surface, which, along with locations identified as sources of the trace gases, could influence the choice of landing sites of future missions.

TGO’s findings will also be used to help plan the second phase of the ExoMars mission, due to fly in 2018 (or possibly 2020 due to budget concerns). This will be a solar-powered rover unit, slightly larger than NASA’s MER rovers, Spirit and Opportunity. It’s also a rover with a long gestation period, having been under development for almost 20 years.

Originally designed to be a much bigger vehicle, ExoMars was going to be a joint ESA / NASA undertaking, with ESA supplying the rover and NASA some of the science instruments and the launch vehicle. However, in 2012, NASA arbitrarily withdrew from the project, forcing Europe to go back to the drawing board and seek Russian support for the mission (Russia is supplying the launch vehicle and the landing platform for the rover, as well as some of the science instruments carried aboard both the rover and TGO).

Artist's impression of the ExoMars rover rolling off of its landing platform (credit: ESA)
Artist’s impression of the ExoMars rover rolling off of its landing platform (credit: ESA)

Unlike NASA’s Curiosity mission (but like NASA’s upcoming Mars 2020 mission), ExoMars is intended to directly seek out evidence of current or past microbial life on Mars. As such, the findings from TGO could be key in the selection of the final landing site for the rover. In addition, TGO will also act as the primary communications relay between the rover and Earth.

It is also as a communications relay that TGO will support the Schiaparelli lander. Officially named the Entry, Descent and Landing Demonstrator Module (EDM), Schiaparelli is intended to help ESA in developing the technology for landing on the surface of Mars with a controlled landing orientation and touchdown velocity. Obviously, a safe entry, descent and controlled landing capability is crucial to the success of the ExoMars rover mission, and Schiaparelli will help in determining the final design and development requirements for the rover’s landing systems.

The Schiaparelli EDM
The Schiaparelli EDM

Continue reading “Space Sunday: a Martian sandwich”

Space Sunday: the Martian tilt and Plutonian clouds

Tethys, Enceladus and Mimas seen above and blow Saturn's rings in a stunning image captured by the NASA / ESA Cassini mission, released on February 22nd, 2016. - are captured in this group photo from NASA's Cassini spacecraft released on Feb. 22. Tethys (660 miles across) appears above the rings, while Enceladus (313 miles across) sits just below center. Mimas (246 miles across) hangs below and to the left of Enceladus. This view looks toward the sunlit side of the rings and was acquired at a distance of approximately 837,000 miles from Enceladus.
Tethys, Enceladus and Mimas seen above and blow Saturn’s rings in a stunning image captured by the NASA / ESA Cassini mission, released on February 22nd, 2016. Tethys, 1056 km (660 mi) in diameter appears above the rings, with  Enceladus, 501 km (313 mi) across, just below them with Mimas, 393.6 km (246 mi) across below and to the left of Enceladus. Looking towards the sunlit side of the rings and was acquired at a distance of approx 1,339,000 km (837,000 mi) from Enceladus (credit: NASA / JPL)

The Sliding Surface of Mars

We’re all familiar with images of the surface of Mars, with the Tharsis volcanoes straddling the equator and the great gash of the Vallis Marineris just to the south. It’s a view seen in many orbital images of the planet, and one thought to have been more-or-less representative of the topography of Mars from the earliest times.

However, new studies by geomorphologists, geophysicists and climatologists led by a team of French scientists, suggest that the surface of the planet underwent a gigantic “tilt” of between 20 to 25 degrees some 3 to 3.5 billion years ago, drastically altering its appearance whilst also offering an explanation for one of the mysteries of Mars.

Mars as we know it today, Arsia Mons, Pavonis Mons, and Ascraeus Mons straddling the equator
Mars as we know it today, Arsia Mons, Pavonis Mons, and Ascraeus Mons straddling the equator, and part of the Tharsis Bulge, with massive Olympus Mons further to the north and west, and the gash of the Vallis Marineris to the south and east

While a process known as variations of obliquity can cause a planet’s axial tilt to shift  over large periods of time (Earth’s axial tilt of 23.4° is decreasing at the rate of about 47 minutes of arc per century, for example), this is not the cause of Mars’ shifting “face”. Rather it is the result of the massive Tharsis Bulge.

The largest volcanic dome in the solar system, Tharsis is a plateau some 5,000 km (3,125 mi) across and around 12 km (7.5 mi) thick, topped by the massive volcanoes of Tharis Montes: Arsia Mons, Pavonis Mons, and Ascraeus Mons. It formed over a period of roughly half a billion to a billion years, commencing around 3.7 billion years ago.

The French research suggests that as the Tharsis Bulge grew as a result of volcanic activity, so it gained considerable mass – perhaps a billion billion tonnes), which caused the crust and mantle of the planet to “slip” around the core, rather like turning the flesh of an apricot around its stone. Thus, Tharsis appears to have “dropped” to the equator from a latitude of around 20 degrees north, completely changing the face of Mars during its first 1 to 1.5 billion years of history – the time at which life might have arisen, if it arose at all.

Mars as it may have appeared around 3.5-3.7 years ago, prior to the Tharsis Bulge forming
Mars as it may have appeared around 3.5-3.7 years ago, prior to the Tharsis Bulge forming (credit: Didier Florentz, Université Paris-Sud)

While such a slippage had previously been suggested, notably through the work of Isamu Matsuyama of the University of Arizona in 2010, the French study is the first to offer definitive geomorphological evidence that this is the case. One of the major outcomes of the work is that it explains why Mars has huge and seemingly anomalous underground reservoirs of water ice located far from the poles. As the mantle and crust shifted, so they carried the frozen land which originally lay over the poles away from them, complete with the subsurface water and ice.

Overall, the study radically alters the generally accepted chronology of Mars, which has Tharsis forming before the before the widespread creation of rivers and water channels on Mars. now it appears that Tharsis formed at a time congruent with the existence of liquid water on Mars and the formation of river valleys and other water features. Thus, the volcanic activity on Tharsis may have actually contributed to the period of liquid stability on the planet.

The Methane Snows and Particle Clouds of Pluto

 enhanced color image is about 2,230 feet (680 meters) per pixel. The image measures approximately 280 miles (450 kilometers) long by 140 miles (225 kilometers) wide. It was obtained by New Horizons at a range of approximately 21,100 miles (33,900 kilometers) from Pluto, about 45 minutes before the spacecraft’s closest approach to Pluto on July 14, 2015.
Captured from a distance of 33,900 km (21,000 mi) from the point of closest approach to Pluto on July 14th, 2015, this New Horizons enhanced colour image reveals the ice-capped mountains of “Cthulhu Regio” in a strip some 450 x 225 km (280 x 140 mi). The image was taken about 45 minutes prior to closest approach (NASA/JPL / DHU?APL / SwRI)

The New Horizons team has discovered a chain of exotic snowcapped mountains stretching across the dark expanse on Pluto informally named “Cthulhu Regio”, one of the minor planet’s more identifiable features, and which stretches almost halfway around Pluto equator, some 3,000 km (1,850 mi) in length and some 750 km (450 mi) across, with one end abutting the ice-covered flats of “Sputnik Planum” I’ve previously written about in my coverage of New Horizons.

The high-resolution images show a mountain range in approximately 420 km ( 260 mi) long, the highest slopes of which are coated with a bright material that contrasts sharply with the dark red of the more usual dark red colouring of the region (thought to be the result of dark tholins, complex molecules initially formed by the reaction of methane and sunlight high in Pluto’s atmosphere, coating much of “Cthulhu Regio”. Scientists believe the white material could be methane which has condensed out of Pluto’s tenuous atmosphere to form ice, coating the peaks, much as ice can condense out of cold air on Earth to form frost. There has even been speculation that the white material is the result of methane ice condensing as “snow” and falling across the peaks.

Continue reading “Space Sunday: the Martian tilt and Plutonian clouds”

Space Sunday: Martian “coral”, Planet Nine and Dream Chasers

The MER rovers first arrived on Mars at the start of 2004. One, Opportunity, is still operating today
The MER rovers first arrived on Mars at the start of 2004. One, Opportunity, is still operating today (credit: NASA / JPL)

Spirit, one of NASA’s two solar-powered Mars Exploration Rover (MER) missions, may have ceased communications with Earth on March 22nd, 2010 and the mission declared over on May 24th, 2011, but its science legacy lives on.

Originally designed with a 90-day primary mission duration, Spirit massively exceeded this, ranging across Mars for a distance of 7.73 kilometres (4.8 mi) over 1,944 days of mobile operations before becoming bogged down in a sand trap on May 1st, 2009, almost 5.5 years after it had arrived on Mars, after which it operated as a stationary research programme for a further 751 days.

During its mobile period, Spirit explored a small rocky plateau dubbed “Home Plate” in 2007 / 2008. Whilst exploring the rock, the rover imaged several peculiar small rock formations resembling cauliflower or coral.  Analysis by the rover’s Mini-Thermal Emission Spectrometer (Mini-TES) revealed the formations to be almost pure silica (SiO2), a mineral associated with volcanic environments.

Silica is formed when water (rain or snow) seeps underground and comes into contact with rocks heated from below by magma. Itself super-heated by the rocks, the water is vaporised and rises back through the ground, dissolving silica and other minerals as it does so, which it deposits around the vents or fumaroles it uses to escape back into the atmosphere.

the "cauliflower" or "coral" formations imaged by MER rover Spirit around the "home Plate" plateau in 2008
the “cauliflower” or “coral” formations imaged by MER rover Spirit around the “home Plate” plateau in 2008 (credit: NASA / JPL)

Warm, rich in silica and minerals, on Earth these fumaroles and vents become havens for bacterial life which is known for creating curious bulbous and branching shapes in silica formations here on Earth which are strikingly similar to those imaged by Spirit. Such is the similarity, that planetary geologist Steven Ruff and geology professor Jack Farmer, both from Arizona State University, have been carrying out detailed studies in the high Atacama Desert, regarded as the most arid non-polar region on Earth, harbouring conditions thought to be very similar to those of ancient Mars.

In particular, they have been investigating the remote geyser fields of El Tatio, some 4.3 km  above mean sea level in an environment which has much in common with the Gusev Crater region of Mars, where “Home Plate” resides. This includes being exposed to high levels of ultraviolet light from the sun and extreme temperatures.  Their investigations revealed forms they call “micro-digitate silica structures” which are both remarkably similar to the formations on Mars, and to those found around fumaroles and vents at lower altitudes here on Earth which are formed by bacteria.

A comparison between images of the formations found on Mars by the MER Spirit (top right), and those images by Ruff and Foster in El titio, Atacama Desert
A comparison between images of the formations found on Mars by the MER Spirit (top right), and those imaged by Ruff and Foster in El Tatio, Atacama Desert (credit: S. Ruff, Arizona State University)

While the pair have yet to come up with definitive evidence that the El Tatio formations are the result of microbial activity, they believe the objects may be “micro-stromatolites”.  Nornally of a much larger size, stromatolites are formed by bacteria “cementing” mineral grains together to form a thin layer. Over time, these layers accumulate one over the last, forming a laminar mound or rock. The oldest stromatolites on Earth are estimated to be some 3.5 billion years old, a time when both Earth an Mars may have shared much closer atmospheric and geological similarities. So, if the formations found at El Tatio do prove to be the result of bacterial activity, then it offers a hypothesis that the formations on Mars may also have been the result of bacterial activity.

Dream Chaser: the Dream is Alive

In January, I wrote about NASA’s surprise decision to award an extended contract for uncrewed resupply missions to  the International Space Station to both of the existing contract holders, SpaceX and Orbital ATK, and to Sierra Nevada Corporation, who will use an uncrewed variant of their Dream Chaser space plane.  At the time I wrote that update, reader Devin  Vaughn indicated an interest in learning more about Dream Chaser, which has an interesting heritage.

As I noted at the time, the vehicle had been one of four private sector contenders to fulfil the role of “space taxi”, ferrying up to 6 at a time from US soil to the ISS. The idea being that by spinning-out the ISS crewed flights to the private sector (with financial support from NASA), the US agency could focus its manned space flight development programme solely on the Orion / SLS programme, which is intended to form the nucleus of US (and possibly international) crewed mission ventures well beyond Earth orbit.

Dream Chaser was unique among the commercial crew transportation proposals as it was based on a "lifting body" design , allowing to re-enter the Earth's atmosphere and glide to a landing on a conventional runway - aspects which still make it a very flexible vehicle
Dream Chaser was unique among the commercial crew transportation proposals as it was based on a “lifting body” design , allowing to re-enter the Earth’s atmosphere and glide to a landing on a conventional runway – aspects which still make it a very flexible vehicle (credit: SNC)

Dream Chaser ultimately wasn’t selected for the crewed mission contract – which caused some friction between Sierra Nevada Corporation and NASA when it was announced in 2014 – but the US space agency continued to work with SNC to help develop the vehicle,  with the Dream Chaser Cargo variant being the result – although SNC has not given up on developed the crewed version of the vehicle.

Dream Chaser Cargo is designed to fly up to 5 tonnes of cargo to / from orbit. This can be both pressurised and unpressurised material, and the vehicle includes the ability for unpressurised cargo to be directly transferred from its cargo module to the exterior of the space station should this be required. As with the original crewed variant, Dream Chaser Cargo will launch atop a rocket, but return to earth to make a conventional runway landing, the latter greatly speeding up the transfer of returned cargo (e.g. science experiments material, etc.) from the vehicle to its intended destination.

Continue reading “Space Sunday: Martian “coral”, Planet Nine and Dream Chasers”

Space Sunday: of Einstein, waves, landers and honours

The LIGO observatory, Hanford, Washington State
The LIGO observatory, Hanford, Washington State (source: LIGO)

Thursday, February 11th saw the announcement of the first direct detection of gravitational waves (not to be confused with “gravity waves”, as some in the media initially took to calling them, but which are something else entirely*), which are ripples in the fabric of space-time whose existence was first proposed by Albert Einstein, in 1916.

The detection came about partly as happenstance, in that the Large Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (LIGO), a world-wide operation established in 1992 and involving 900 scientists from 80 institutions in 15 countries. However, the detectors in use up until recently had failed to provide direct evidence of gravitational waves.

Albert Einstein in 1916, when he was formulating his General Theory of Relativity
Albert Einstein in 1916, when he was formulating his General Theory of Relativity (source: Wikipedia)

Enter the National Science Foundation in the United States.  Over the last five years, they have funded the development and construction of two “Advanced LIGO” detectors, themselves massive feats of technology and engineering, located 3,000 km apart in the United States. One resides Livingston, Louisiana, and the other in Hanford, Washington State.

These detectors started running in February2015, in what was called an “engineering mode”. However, in September 2015 work started on running them up to full operational status when, and completely unexpectedly and within milliseconds of one another, both appeared to detect gravitational passing through them.

The odds of such an event occurring almost precisely at the time when the detectors were starting to do the work for which they have been designed would seem to be – and no pun intended – astronomical. As a result the LIGO investigators wanted to be sure of what had just happened and verify what they had apparently detected; hence why the news was only released on February 11th, 2016, several months after the actual detection had been made.

Since the initial detection, the LIGO teams have deduced the gravitational waves were created by two black holes, each barely 150km across,  but each travelling at around half the speed of light and massing around 30 times as much as our on Sun, spinning around one another and merging together some 1.3 billion light years away. As such, the detection marked two things: the first direct proof of gravitational waves and the conformation of a another theory: that black holes can meet and coalesce to create much larger black holes.

But what are “gravitational waves”, and why are they important?

Predicted over a century ago by Einstein in his theory of general relativity, gravitational waves are at their most basic, ripples in spacetime, generated by the acceleration or deceleration of massive objects in the cosmos. So, for example, if a star goes supernova or two black holes collide or if two super-massive neutron stars orbit closely about one another, they will distort spacetime, creating ripples which propagate outwards from their source, like ripples across the surface of a pond. The problem has been that these ripples are incredibly hard to detect, although the proof that they may well exist has been available since 1974.

It was in that year, two decades after Einstein’s passing, that astronomers at the Arecibo Radio Observatory in Puerto Rico discovered a binary pulsar (two rapidly rotating neutron stars orbiting one another). Over the ensuing years, astronomers measured how the period of the stars’ orbits changed over time. By 1982 it had been determined the stars were getting closer to each other at exactly the rate Einstein’s  of general theory relativity predicted would be required for the generation of gravitational waves. In the 40 years since its discovery, the system has continued to fit so precisely with the theory, and astronomers have had little doubt it is emitting gravitational waves.

The moment of detection: September 14th, 2015
The moment of detection: September 14th, 2015 (source: BBC News)

The LIGO detection however, provides the first direct  evidence of gravitational waves, and with it comes the ability to see the universe in a totally new way.

“It’s like Galileo pointing the telescope for the first time at the sky,” LIGO team member Vassiliki  Kalogera, a professor of physics and astronomy at Northwestern University in Illinois, said. “You’re opening your eyes — in this case, our ears — to a new set of signals from the universe that our previous technologies did not allow us to receive, study and learn from.”

Just as we’re able to study the universe in various wavelengths of light, using them to reveal things we otherwise would not be able to see, so gravitational waves will allow us to see the more of the dynamics in cosmic events which have so far remained hidden from us. We would in theory be able to see precisely what is happening in the heart of a supernova for example, and be able to detect the collisions and mergers of black holes, and more. So gravitational waves offer us a further means to increase our understanding of the cosmos.

(*In case you were wondering, gravity waves are physical perturbations driven by the restoring force of gravity in a planetary environment; that is, they are specific to planetary atmospheres and bodies of water, not cosmological events.)

Continue reading “Space Sunday: of Einstein, waves, landers and honours”

Space Sunday: Juno, Orion and getting to Mars

An artist's impression of Juno orbiting Jupiter (Nasa JPL)
An artist’s impression of Juno orbiting Jupiter (Nasa JPL)

Juno is the name of the NASA deep space vehicle due to rendezvous with Jupiter in July 2016. Launched August 5th, 2011, from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, the mission is designed to study Jupiter’s composition, gravity field, magnetic field, and polar magnetosphere, as well as seeking evidence and clues on how the planet formed, including whether it has a solid core, the amount of water present within the deep atmosphere, how its mass is distributed, and its deep winds, which can reach speeds of 618 kilometres per hour (384 mph).

Unlike most vehicles designed to operate beyond the orbit of Mars, which tend to utilise radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs) to produce their electrical power, Juno uses three massive solar arrays, the largest ever deployed on a planetary probe, which play an integral role in stabilising the spacecraft.

On arrival at Jupiter on July 4th, 2016, Juno will enter a 14-day polar orbit around the planet, where it will remain through the duration of the mission, which should last until February 2018, when the vehicle, fuel for its manoeuvring systems almost depleted, will be commanded to perform a de-orbit manoeuvre and burn-up in Jupiter’s upper atmosphere.

Juno's journey
Juno’s journey (image: NASA)

Currently travelling at some 25 kilometres per second relative to the Earth and 7.6 kilometres per second relative to the Sun, Juno has used a 5-year gravity assist mission to reach its destination.

The first part of this saw the craft launched into an extended orbit about Earth which carried it beyond the orbit of Mars (2012), before swinging back to make a close flyby of Earth in 2013 which both used Earth’s gravity well to accelerate the craft and as a “slingshot” to curve it onto a trajectory that would carry it to Jupiter.

By the time Juno enters orbit around Jupiter, it will have travelled some 2.8 billion kilometres (1.74 billion miles, or 18.7 AU).

Juno’s planned polar orbit is highly elliptical and takes it to within 4,300 kilometres (2,672 mi) of either pole at its closest approach to the planet, while at its furthest point from Jupiter, it will be beyond the orbit of Callisto, hence the 14–day orbital period. This extreme orbit allows Juno to avoid any long-term contact with Jupiter’s powerful radiation belts, which might otherwise cause significant damage to the vehicle’s solar power arrays and electronics. Overall, Juno will receive much lower levels of radiation exposure than the Galileo mission. But even allowing for this, there is no guarantee the exposed science instruments on the vehicle will last the full duration of the mission. Scientists and engineers are hoping the JunoCam and Jovian Infra-red Auroral Mapper (JIRAM), will last at least eight of the mission’s 37 orbits of Juptier, and that the microwave radiometer will survive for at least eleven orbits.On Wednesday February 3rd, 2016, the vehicle completed the first of two final manoeuvres designed to correctly align it with its intended point of orbital insertion around Jupiter. The second such manoeuvre will take just before Juno is due to arrive at Jupiter.   The spacecraft’s name comes from Greco-Roman mythology. The god Jupiter drew a veil of clouds around himself to hide his mischief, but his wife, the goddess Juno, was able to peer through the clouds and see Jupiter’s true nature – just as it is hoped the mission will probe deep into the planet’s atmosphere and reveal its true nature and origins.

Orion at Kennedy Space Centre

Now set for launch in September 2018 on a circumlunar mission lasting 20 days, the second Orion space vehicle arrived at Kennedy Space Centre, Florida, on Wednesday, February 3rd, 2016. The vehicle, sans its outer skin and massing 1.22 tonnes, arrived from NASA’s assembly facility iin Louisiana by air aboard the agency’s “Super Guppy” transporter, which has been transporting space vehicle components since the Apollo era.

Further construction activities and a variety of tests will be performed at KSC and NASA’s Glenn Research Centre in Ohio to prepare the craft for its mission, officially titled Exploration Mission 1 (EM-1). This will see the uncrewed Orion launched for the first time with and operational, European-built Service Module atop its dedicated Space Launch System (SLS) rocket.

A European Orion Service Module having the launch payload fairings attached to it. The Orion vehicle is attached to the circular part of the Service module visible at the top. This was a structure flight test article used in Orion's first test flight in December 2014 (image: Airbus / ESA)
A European Orion Service Module having the launch payload fairings attached to it. The Orion vehicle is attached to the circular part of the Service module visible at the top. This was a structure flight test article used in Orion’s first test flight in December 2014 (image: ESA / NASA)

“This mission is pretty exciting to us,” Scott Wilson, NASA’s Orion production manager, said as the capsule arrived at KSC. “It is the first time we will have the operational human-rated version of Orion on top of the SLS rocket. It’s a lot of work, but a very exciting time for us.”

The flight will see the Orion system launched into Earth orbit, where a purpose-built upper stage propulsion unit will power the craft onto a flight towards the Moon.

Orion will use the relatively low lunar gravity to both accelerate it and throw it into an elliptical orbit, carrying it a further 70,000 kilometres beyond the Moon – almost half a million kilometres (312,500 miles) from Earth – further than any space vehicle designed to carry humans has yet flown.

Following this, the vehicle will swing back towards Earth, passing the Moon once more before the Command Module separates from the Service Module to make a controlled entry into Earth’s atmosphere and a splashdown in the Pacific Ocean.

The flight will be a comprehensive test of the European-built Service Module, which is vital for providing power and propulsion to the Orion capsule, and which is being built using  the expertise Europe gained in building and operating the Automated Transfer Vehicle, which remains the largest ISS resupply vehicle so far used in space.  The Service Module includes four post-launch deployable solar panels for electrical power, and provides power, heat rejection, the in-space propulsion capability for orbital transfer, attitude control and high-altitude ascent aborts. It also houses water, oxygen and nitrogen for deep space missions.

Like the Apollo Command and Service modules vehicles, the Orion capsule sits on top of the Service Module at launch, covered by the launch abort system shroud, the service Module protected by special payload fairings and mated to the SLS upper stage propulsion unit. The launch abort system and the fairings are jettisoned once the Orion has reached low Earth obit and has separated from the rest of the SLS booster. The Service Module solar panels are then deployed, and the upper stage of the booster re-fires, sending Orion on its way.

The 2018 mission will be followed in 2023 by a similar flight, this time carrying a crew of four further into space than any humans have ever previously been. Together, Orion and the SLS are intended to be the backbone of America’s return to the moon and for human missions to Mars.

Continue reading “Space Sunday: Juno, Orion and getting to Mars”

Space Sunday: day of remembrance, seeing Mars and flying over Ceres

This week marked a sombre period in the annals of NASA’s history. In a period of just 7 days – albeit spread across 50 years – America lost 17 astronauts in just three space flight related tragedies. Every year, the US space agency marks this loss of life – the results of the Apollo 1, Challenger and Columbia accidents – with a special Day of Remembrance on the 27th January. This year’s event was particularly poignant in that 2016 marks the 30th anniversary of the Challenger disaster.

It was on January 27th, 1967, that NASA suffered the first of these tragedies when, during a pre-launch rehearsal of what was intended to be the first manned flight of the Apollo Command and Service modules, a fire broke out inside the Command Module as the vehicle sat on the pad of Cape Kennedy Air Force Station Launch Complex 34. A combination of a pure oxygen atmosphere at a high internal PSI, and highly flammable materials used in the vehicle’s interior construction resulted in the deaths of Command Pilot Virgil I. “Gus” Grissom, Senior Pilot Edward H. White II, and Pilot Roger B. Chaffee in just 16 seconds.

Apollo 1: (l-to-r) Virgil I. "Gus" Grissom, Edward H. White II, and Roger B. Chaffee standing before the Apollo 1 launch vehicle, on January 17th, 1961
Apollo 1: (l-to-r) Virgil I. “Gus” Grissom, Edward H. White II, and Roger B. Chaffee standing before the Apollo 1 launch vehicle, on January 17th, 1961

Nineteen years later, on January 28th, 1986, NASA suffered its largest loss of life in a space mission up until that point in time. It occurred when Space Launch System mission 51L, the 25th flight in the space shuttle programme and the 10th flight of the shuttle orbiter vehicle Challenger – regarded as the veteran of the fleet, having flown more orbital missions than the other three orbiter vehicles at that time – exploded 73 seconds after launch, resulting in the loss of all seven crew.

The Challenger 7: (l-to-r) Sharon Christa McAuliffe, Gregory Jarvis, Judith Resnik, Francis "Dick" Scobee, Ronald McNair, Michael Smith and Elison Onizuka, during a countdown training exercise on January 9th, 1986
The Challenger Seven: (l-to-r) Sharon Christa McAuliffe, Gregory Jarvis, Judith Resnik, Francis “Dick” Scobee, Ronald McNair, Michael J. Smith and Ellison Onizuka, during a countdown training exercise on January 9th, 1986

Tragedy struck the space shuttle programme again on February 1st, 2003, when the space shuttle Columbia broke-up following re-entry into the Earth’s atmosphere at the end of mission STS-107, killing all seven crew. On board were Commander Rick Husband, Pilot William McCool, Payload Commander Michael Anderson, Mission Specialists Laurel Blair Salton Clark, Kalpana Chawla, David M. Brown, and Payload Specialist  Ilan Ramon, a colonel in the Israeli Air Force and the first Israeli astronaut.

The official STS-107 crew photo (l-to-r): Brown, Husband, Clark, Chawla, Anderson, McCool, Ramon
The official STS-107 crew photo (l-to-r): David M. Brown, Rick Husband, Laurel Blair Salton Clark, Kalpana Chawla, Michael P Anderson, William C. McCool, and Ilan Ramon

There have of course been other lives lost within the fraternity of astronauts and cosmonauts over the decades. However, these three tragedies perhaps stand larger than others because NASA has always undertaken its missions in the full glare of the public and media spotlight. Apollo 1, for example, was the headline mission for America meeting President Kennedy’s requirement for “landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth” before the end of the decade. Similarly, STS-51L, the Challenger mission, had been specifically engineered to be in the public eye, featuring as it did the first teacher in space, Sharon Christa McAuliffe.

McAuliffe had been selected from more than 11,000 applicants to participate in NASA’s Teacher in Space Project, initiated by US Present Ronald Reagan and intended by NASA to rejuvenate public interest in the space programme, which has been declining steadily since the first space shuttle flight in 1981. The gamble paid off and McAuliffe, became a media sensation, attracting world-wide public interest in STS-51L; so much so that it has been estimated that around 17% of Americans watched Challenger’s lift-off live on television as a direct result of McAuliffe’s presence on the mission, and that around 85% heard about the disaster within an hour of it occurring (and if that doesn’t sound unusual, remember 1986 was well before the Internet and media revolution what has placed information and news at our fingertips wherever we are).

It could be argued – particularly with regards to Challenger, and also with Apollo 1, that the disaster could have been avoided. Warnings about the precise type of failure which caused the loss of Challenger date back as far as 1971, which tests carried out in 1977 revealing the risk of what because known as an O-ring failure being inherent in the design of the shuttle’s solid rocket boosters.

Things are less clear in the case of the Columbia tragedy; while it has been suggested that a rescue mission might have been mounted using the shuttle orbiter Atlantis, which was being prepared for a mission due to lift-off at the start of March, 2003. However, in order to get the vehicle flight ready for a launch ahead of the February 15th deadline (the point at which lithium hydroxide, a critical part of the systems used to remove carbon dioxide from the air in a space vehicle, would run out aboard Columbia), was itself fraught with risks.

But whether they could be avoided or not, these three disasters remind us that the cost of becoming a space faring civilisation – something which could be vital to our survival – is not without risk. Which is why I’ll close this part of Space Sunday with the words of Francis R. Scobee, the Commander of STS-51L, written shortly before his death aboard the Challenger:

Continue reading “Space Sunday: day of remembrance, seeing Mars and flying over Ceres”