LL launches Event region product + some thoughts

via Linden Lab

Update, June 23rd, 2022: Linden Lab has officially announced updates to the Event region product(s). Please refer to Event Regions: New Pricing and Offerings – Linden Lab and Lab announces updated Event and Event Elite Regions + pricing – this blog.

Update, June 20th, 2022: Speaking at his Meet the Lindens session at SL19B, Patch Linden, VP of Land Operations, indicated that the fee for Event regions will remain at US $599 a month & no set-up fee. Summary notes with link to the video available here. However, the comments and thoughts originally offered towards the end of this piece remain unchanged, as they are historically relevant.

The number of avatars a region can support has often been a headache for those wishing to hold large-scale events – and something the Lab has long been aware of itself. Traditionally, to host a reasonably large number of avatars at a single event in comfort (e.g. 75+), it has often been necessarily to have two or four regions, with the stage space effectively straddling them.

However, during recent months, the Lab has been testing a new region type, capable of supporting relatively large numbers of avatars. This testing has included providing the new region product to a number of events in Second Life that have high numbers of avatars passing through them.

Most recently, when speaking at the VWBPE 2022¹, event, Patch Linden indicated that the new region type – called Event regions – were definitely on the product development roadmap.

On Monday, May 2nd, the Lab officially launched the Event region type via an official blog post, stating:

Have you ever dreamed of being able to hold large scale events in Second Life? Have you ever wished you could keep the lag monster at bay during large events? Perhaps you just want your scripts to all go vroom?  Well wonder, wait and wish no more! Sporting the latest upgrades in grid technologies that have been enabled by our migration to the cloud, these regions have been tested running large events in real-world scenarios such as those really big monthly shopping events, and live performances! Our tests saw nearly 200 avatars successfully able to shop and party in these regions.

from Linden Lab

The post lists the capabilities / options that come with the new Event region product as:

  • A maximum avatar limit of 175 per Event region.
  • Up to 30,000 land impact.
    • While this region type will support up to 30,000 Land Impact, during testing, LL identified a few cases where exceeding 20,000 Land Impact will degrade performance with a large number of concurrent visitors.
  • Extended chat ranges upon request, allowing chat to travel further across the region.
  • RaaS: Rollbacks as a Service – Request to restore your region to a previous state as needed – some restrictions apply.
  • IaaS: Instancing as a Service – Request to have your region duplicated to another region.
  • White glove Concierge service.
  • Over 20% Improved script performance.

These new regions can be ordered by submitting  a support ticket.

Pricing for these region types is somewhat surprising:

  • From now until June 6th, 2022, Event regions will be available at US $599 per month, with no set-up fee.
  • After June 6th, 2022, the fee will be:
    • US $999 for the first month (including a $100 set-up fee, which is slightly less than that for a Full region’s $120).
    • US $899 per month after the first 30 days.

I say “surprising” because while the initial “offer price” of US $599 does not sound entirely unreasonable given the added capabilities / support options, the $899 month tier most certainly does. Certainly, in terms of events, this latter price-point will likely place the cost of these regions well outside the budget of many events they might otherwise be well suited towards handling (e.g. a one-off weekend concert, for example).

Conversely, the US $599 price point, whilst high, is a lot more comfortable than US $899, and could encourage more widespread adoption of the new product across a range of potential uses over a much longer period of time among users (corporate partners, obviously, may not find the pricing an issue, if it  encompasses them).

Even so, and in terms of pure events, I would have thought something along the lines of a pro-rata system based on the proposed length of use might have been more all-encompassing.

And turning to the capabilities and options offered with the new Event region product, there is one element in the bullet list that could do with further exposition: “Instancing as a Service” – as I enquired on the forum thread related to the announcement:

  • Does this genuinely mean simultaneous instancing, on an on-demand basis (e.g. I can simply request another instance of my event to be spun-up based on the demand I’m seeing  –  and request it is taken down when demand drops below the level where it is no longer required)?.
  • Is it limited to just the one instance (as the wording perhaps implies), or multiple instances?
  • Is instancing covered by the “original” region’s tier, or is a surcharge applicable? If so, how much?

Those with a similar interest in this aspect of the product should keep an eye on the thread for any official response.

In the meantime, complete information on the launch can be found in the official blog post.


  1. Patch’s comments can be heard in the What’s Up at the Lab VWBPE video:

4 thoughts on “LL launches Event region product + some thoughts

  1. Put a stage across 2 regions. It’s cheaper, more prims and will hold 200 people.


    1. Yeah… I did actually do a series of comparative price breakdowns in a draft of this piece, but opted to drop them for brevity! 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I think it’s a brilliant product that’s long, long overdue… but I agree that the price point seems unrealistic. I’m sure there are events that could support this, but I’m not convinced that the (potentially) higher visitor count would make up the difference through higher revenue. More importantly, what about all the smaller events?

    The instancing service seems interesting, but as Inara points out, it needs clarification.


Comments are closed.