2025 week #46: SUG meeting summary

Celestial Vale, August 2025 – blog post

The following notes were taken from the Tuesday, November 11th, 2025 Simulator User Group (SUG) meeting. These notes form a summary of the items discussed, and are not intended to be a full transcript. They were taken from the video recording by Pantera, embedded at the end of this summary – my thanks to Pantera for providing it.

Meeting Overview

  • The Simulator User Group (also referred to by its older name of Server User Group) exists to provide an opportunity for discussion about simulator technology, bugs, and feature ideas is held every other Tuesday at 12:00 noon, SLT (holidays, etc., allowing), per the Second Life Public Calendar.
  • The “SUG Leviathan Hour” meetings are held on the Tuesdays which do not have a formal SUG meeting, and are chaired by Leviathan Linden. They are more brainstorming / general discussion sessions.
  • Meetings are held in text in-world, at this location.

Simulator Deployments

  • On Tuesday, November 11th, the SLS Main channel was restarted without any deployment.
  • On Wednesday, November 12th:
    • All RC channels other than BlueSteel and Preflight should be updated with a new simulator update (Imbu). This “has a couple of performance memory fixes in the simulator. It fixes an issue with region names that contain a ‘.”
    • The BlueSteel and Preflight RC channels will be restarted without any update.

SLua Work

  • Rider Linden has been refactoring some of the official native VS Code plugin for LSL and SLua, and is planning on opening it up and making the repository public on Friday, November 14th.
  • There was a SLua update on the beta grid during week #45:
  • Since then, Harold has been cleaning up the bugs found with that release, with the aim of getting a limited deploy to a few simulators on Agni (the Main grid) later in November. This will be to simulators hosting Lab-managed regions; “volunteer” regions from region holders will be accepted further down the deployment road.
  • Viewer-side support for SLua is also defined as “iffy” – an update to the viewer has been anticipated, but work on it is pending Harold competing the work fixing the bugs in the simulator deployment.
  • A question was asked as to why vectors and quaternions are immutable in SLua. In reply, Harold stated:
Vectors are immutable because that’s just how it is in Luau, they’re not garbage-collected, they’re a value type. Storing a vector is exactly as cheap as storing a number. Quaternions _are_ garbage collected but they’re immutable for symmetry with how vectors work, and honestly people don’t tend to create a bajillion of them per frame so IDK if making them mutable is worth it. GC overhead isn’t something you have to worry about so much since we abstract away most of the GC details. 
They’re not reference types so mutability probably wouldn’t work the way anyone would expect without special language support that would be hard. In reality, they were never mutable in LSL either, it just sort of pretended they were by hiding the fact that it was actually making a whole new vector.
    • Harold also noted that he settled on the canonical name “quaternion” in SLua because it’s easier to google what to do with them compared to “rotation”(which could mean anything), but he is open to ideas on this. The term appeared to find acceptance among those at the meeting, with the conversion flowing through the middle third of the meeting.
  • It was asked if it would be possible to add more functions to SL standard SLua libraries – e.g. someone writes really commonly used functions that might then – be included in common/native libraries?
    • The reply was yes, it is possible, but currently LL are being conservative because while it is relatively easy to add things, it is harder to removed them later if they turn out to be a bad abstraction or similar.
    • This led to a broader discussion on SLua scripting, etc.

In Brief

  • Leviathan Linden has been carrying out Voice related work, but is now “almost done” with that. He is currently focusing back on simulator crash and performance issues.
  • Leviathan also provided some feedback on a question from his “office hours” meeting on November 4th:
[I was asked] last week about some bugs in llBase64ToString() method. Apparently it was designed to replace C0 control codes (chars with numerical values < 32) with “?”, and fails to replace a C0 character if it is at the end of the string. I looked at the code and as far as I can tell that really is a bug… we skip the last character of the string for an “off by one” error. It has been around since before 2007. The question is: can we fix it?
    • It was suggested that either LL should make a new llBase64ToStringFixed() LSL function so as to preserve compatibility with old scripts implementing their own workaround; or a fix similar to that for XorBase64* is implemented.
  • Monty Linden is “looking into weird bugs and doing a project related to mobile.”
  • Pepper Linden has been carrying out more Conductor work to help with region packing. Pepper has also been engaged in the work on outfits support for the next SL Mobile update.
  • A question was asked on the status of long-discussed possible updates / improvements to in-world Land Impact calculations (such as removing Scale as a factor, as had been most “recently” discussed in SUG meetings). In short: no real progress at this time, due to the issue being somewhat complicated.
    • This led to a conversation on Land Impact, LODs (and LOd decimation) allowing larger megaprims, etc.
  • Also flowing through themeeting was a conversation relating to region sizes, region crossings, water planes, etc.

Date of Next Meetings

  • Leviathan Linden: Tuesday, November 18th, 2025.
  • Formal SUG meeting: Tuesday, November 25th, 2025.

† The header images included in these summaries are not intended to represent anything discussed at the meetings; they are simply here to avoid a repeated image of a rooftop of people every week. They are taken from my list of region visits, with a link to the post for those interested.

2025 week #45: SL CCUG and Open Source (TPVD) meetings summary

Hippotropolis Campsite: venue for CCUG meetings
The following notes were taken from my audio recording and chat log of the Content Creation User Group (CCUG) meeting of Thursday, November 6th, 2025 and my chat log of that meeting, together with Pantera’s video (embedded at the end of this article) and my chat log of the Open-Source Developer meeting on Friday, November 7th, 2025.
Table of Contents

Please note that this is not a full transcript of either meeting but a summary of key topics.

Meeting Purpose

  • The CCUG meeting is for discussion of work related to content creation in Second Life, including current and upcoming LL projects, and encompasses requests or comments from the community, together with related viewer development work.
    • This meeting is generally held on alternate Thursdays at Hippotropolis and is held in a mix of Voice and text chat.
  • The OSUG meeting is a combining of the former Third Party Viewer Developer meeting and the Open Source Development meetings. It is open discussion of Second Life development, including but not limited to open source contributions, third-party viewer development and policy, and current open source programs.
    • This meeting is generally held twice a month on a Friday, at 13:00 SLT at the Hippotropolis Theatre and is generally text chat only.
  • Dates and times of meetings are recorded in the SL Public Calendar.

Official Viewer Status

General Viewer Updates

  • 2025.08 is liable to be the last viewer release for the year, with development work as a whole (including server-side) liable to slowing down due to end-of-year holidays and company breaks.
    • That said, Geenz Linden is hoping to get the go-ahead to try and get “a few things” out for the door before year-end. These include fixes/improvements to PBR water , and also clearing some technical debt.
    • The fixes/improvements to PBR water sparked a brief conversation on the PBR water issues and solutions (e.g. tweaks to SSR and whether or not these will “fix” things – although it was made clear that the “old” water reflections code will not be coming back to the official viewer codebase).
  • Work is progressing on getting a Linux flavour of the official viewer back into shape. Those interested in the work can find it in this viewer repository, and the Lab is actively looking for feedback.
    • Note that this build is WebRTC only, Vivox Voice is not supported.
    • Depending on progress / feedback there is a potential for this viewer to surface as a Release Candidate / beta viewer before the end of the year – Geenz is hoping to achieve this as a part of the technical debt clean-up work.
  • Open Source meeting: Geenz is attempting to move forward with replacing the viewer Contributor License Agreement with digital certificates of origin for code contributions to the official viewer.
    • In short, instead of contributors having to read through and accept LL’s code license, and assign rights accordingly, when a code contribution is made, the originator  just adds a sign-off as a part of the code contribution commit.
    • There will be new documentation on this revised process that will be made available ahead of it being implemented.

You Tube Embedding Issue

  • You Tube recently updated elements of their video embedding code such that non i-frame youtube.com/embed/NNNNN style links will not work within Second Life (whilst youtube.com/watch/NNNNN style links will still function correctly – although this latter format does expose all the You Tube on-screen video controls, etc).
  • This is an issue liable to impact a variety of in-world television and similar systems utilising You Tube.
  • The is very much a You Tube issue, so while the Lab could investigate options for workarounds there is no guarantee they would remain valid / useful for any length of time.
  • Note that (obviously) Vemeo (and other services) video embedding is unaffected by this issue, as does hosting from a personal server.

CCUG Discussion – In Brief

  • Brief discussion on the following PBR bugs:
  • A request was made for an official viewer specific user group “to discuss the UI”.
    • As pointed out at other meetings where this has been raised, there are already two user groups wherein the official viewer and TPVs are discussed: the Content Creation User Group, and the Open-Source Development User Group (formerly the TPV Developer UG). Adding a third really doesn’t add anything significant.
    • In terms of UI “discussions”, it was suggested these are rarely fruitful with in a large group, as opinions tend to be subjective / biased according to which viewer people prefer to use, and which UI style (viewer 1.2X style or viewer 2.0+ style or variations thereof) they like. Ergo, a meeting specifically focused on the viewer UI isn’t potentially going to be that beneficial in terms of generating actual UI improvements.
  • A discussion on SL enhancements and prioritisations: A general note on the complexities of making enhancements to SL and determining what should / can be done and when.
    • In terms of graphical enhancements, it was noted that often, these tend to work best with dedicated / more recent GPU cards, with the problem being that stats show the majority of SL users tend to run medium or lower specification hardware, often with more limited GPUs and / or integrated graphics which may or may not be able to adequately run newer rendering options. Thus, the implementation of such capabilities can become a complex balancing act of determining what the “average” SL system can manage, how well it can do so without dramatically changing how SL appears to the user (changes to SL’s in-world appearance often causing widespread backlash when changes are made), determining what the general defaults for new capabilities should be in order to best address end-user hardware capabilities, etc.
    • Then there are enhancements to the platform which may not have a performance impact, but which do have questions around them in terms of overall benefit to users (e.g. quality of life improvements for the majority of users, content creation improvements, etc.), and also around resources required to bring them to fruition, etc., all of which need to be balanced against one another and with things like graphics improvements, et al, in order for the Lab to determine prioritisations.
  • The above extended to offering hardware cut-off points for SL, with the Lab preferring to keep this more towards operating systems (and associated hardware drivers, etc.) reached a manufacturer’s end-of-life, rather than arbitrarily setting cut-off points.
    • An example of this could be taken with older versions of the Mac OS (e.g. OS 12 or older). LL would like to cease support for these versions of the OS and focus on more recent releases offering support for more up-to-date libraries, etc., offering better functionality, but the number of Mac users still running systems only capable of running older versions of the OS currently prevents LL from setting a cut-off for Mac support.
    • The flipside to this is when OS vendors present an end-of-life for a given operating system, it can actually benefit SL and users who do upgrade (e.g. the ending of official support for Windows 10 bringing many older versions of Intel’s integrated HD graphics to an end of life state).
  • The above expanded into a conversation on communications, keeping users informed of SL’s capabilities and changes, what can be done within SL with the right viewer settings, informing users of the potential impact on their systems of enabling  / increasing various settings (based on stats, etc., the viewer is dynamically gathering on in-world scenes and the hardware running the viewer), etc
  • Geenz indicated that a longer-term hope is that more work can be done in making the viewer more multi-threaded in CPU use and cutting down on the reliance on co-routines within the viewer code as a result. However, no time frames on this.

OSUG Discussion – In Brief

  • It is likely that the current alpha-blend Blinn-Phong issues are likely to be fixed prior to year-end, as these require server-side work as well, and the server team is already very busy with WebRTC and SLua.
  • The first part of the meeting involved a discussion on Linden water reflection, Screen Space Reflections, lighting probes (all as summarised above) and a potted history of invisiprims and their “return” as water exclusion surfaces.
    • Elements of work Geenz is looking to try to get moved forward with the viewer include:
    • Re-introducing legacy search.
    • Discord integration with the viewer.
    • Making the viewer updater “more open source friendly”.
    • “Killing” Autobuild in the viewer build process.
  • Geenz offered a PSA to TPVs:
 If you are receiving increased reports about the latest AMD drivers causing problems with shadows enabled, I can confirm that a rollback to the previous version fixes that. I’m already digging around to see who I can report a driver bug to.
  • A request was put forward to have TPV stats (usage per OS, crash rates and crash types) on a more frequent basis once more (they were at one time monthly, then switched to weekly before becoming more sporadic once more). This will be looked into.

Next Meetings

November 2025 SL Web User Group

The Web User Group meeting venue, Denby

The following notes cover the key points from the Web User Group (WUG) meeting, held on Wednesday November 5th, 2025. These notes form a summary of the items discussed and is not intended to be a full transcript. The official video is embedded at the end of this summary.

Meeting Overview

  • The Web User Group exists to provide an opportunity for discussion on Second Life web properties and their related functionalities / features. This includes, but is not limited to: the Marketplace, pages surfaced through the secondlife.com dashboard; the available portals (land, support, etc), and the forums.
  • As a rule, these meetings are conducted:
    • On the first Wednesday of the month and 14:00 SLT.
    • In both Voice and text.
    • At this location.
  • Meetings are open to anyone with a concern / interest in the above topics, and form one of a series of regular / semi-regular User Group meetings conducted by Linden Lab.
  • Dates and times of all current meetings can be found on the Second Life Public Calendar, and descriptions of meetings are defined on the SL wiki.

Updates

  • Upgrades to Marketplace tech stack and adding resilience to systems in the case of external outages (as happened this summer with Elastic Search).
  • Further account security initiatives which will be rolling out soon, some of which should help prevent attempts at account take-overs.
  • The roll-out of the “No Stipend” Premium Plus subscription. See:
  • Marketplace PLE blip:
    • PLEs were not charged between October 6th through October 28th inclusive, although subscriptions were still active and running. This caused a batch charge to occur on October 28th, which proved difficult for merchants.
    • If any merchants believe they were charged more than once as a result of these issues, please raise a support ticket.
    • LL is now working on adding more logging to these systems to prevent similar situations in the future.
  • Quality of life updates:
    • A fix to correct viewer splash screen images being cut off.
    • A fix for a display bug were review font sizes were off.
  • Under-the-hood work including:
    • Completion of the Python library upgrade for internal services.
    • A Redis upgrade which should improve shopping cart contents persistence across sessions.

General Discussion

  • The question of Marketplace / CasperVend integration was once again raised. The short answer to this is:
    • Yes, the Lab would like to work on integration between Marketplace and the in-world shopping experience offered by CasperVend, but this requires working on some baseline tech and updates which have yet to be put in place.
    • The Lab is also keen to see a bi-directional unification of features between CasperVend and the Marketplace (e.g. features of CasperVend such as gift cards, better support for sales and discounts being extended to the MP, and features within the MP not found within CasperVend also being extended that way).
    • Currently there are no time frames as to when any of this work is likely to surface.
  • A request was made for merchants to be able to delete “negative” or “harassing” reviews (a problematic request as best, given it could open the door to the deletion of any “negative” review a merchant takes issue with, no matter how valid the actual critique).
    • It was pointed out that there are already the means to flag genuinely harassing, etc., viewers.
    • It was also indicated that a request had been put forward to make the names of reviewers active links, allowing others users to click and see all reviews by a given individual, thus allowing them to better judge the reviewer’s objectiveness.
  • The request to make Marketplace images clickable to display larger version / to zoom-in on them was again raised.
    • It was indicated that LL are considering implementing some form of image zoom capability / support for higher-resolution images on MP listings.
    • However, with the focus on quality of life improvements, bug fixes, etc., this work has yet to be prioritised.
    • This led to a further discussion on MP images encompassing their use by the visually impaired, how Amazon handles images, etc.
  • Kali Linden noted another capability that is being considered is that of a “Demo / Try Before You Buy” button within MP listings. However, (and again), how this might work and when it might actually be implemented is still open to question.
  • A discussion on listings & translations and sometimes listing being mis-translated, which rolled into a general discussion on the presentation of the Marketplace website (not making full use of the browser tab width), issues with people mistaking items in the Featured section on the MP homepage as “recommended” items, rather than paid advertising; new users being unable to easily differentiate between “modern” content (e.g. good mesh with (or without) PBR and older flexiprim or sculptie content or low-resolution skins etc.),  as by default, listings do not offer any indication of an item’s age (e.g. when first uploaded), etc.
  • A discussion on the Second Life dashboard and possible improvements. Suggestions included:
    • Making the Friends Online and Groups lists more usable (e.g. so that Friends and Groups can actually be managed from them rather than having to go in-world to do so)
    • Displaying Group notices within a section of the dashboard.
    • Making elements such as Friends Online pop-outs in their own browser frames.
    • Updating the Blogs section with the feeds from the SL Blogger Network feeds as well as including the official blogs.
    • Implementing a dark mode for the pages in line with other SL pages / portal (e.g. the Linden Homes pages and the Land portal).
    • Providing more in the way of dynamic / updated content to encourage engagement, together with more informative communications from the Lab.

Next Meeting

  • Wednesday, December 3rd, 2025.

October 2025 SL Mobile UG meeting summary

Campwich Forest grounds: location for the Monthly Mobile User Group (MMUG)
The following notes were taken from the Thursday, September 25th 2025 Monthly Mobile User Group (MMUG) meeting. These notes should not be taken as a full transcript of the meeting, which was largely held in Voice, but rather a summary of the key topics discussed.

The meeting was recorded by Pantera, and her video is embedded at the end of this summary – my thanks, as always to her in providing it.

Table of Contents

Meeting Purpose

  • The Mobile User Group provides a platform to share insights on recent mobile updates and upcoming features, and to receive feedback directly from users.
  • These meetings are conducted (as a rule):
    • The last Thursday of every month at 12:00 noon SLT.
    • In Voice and text.
    • At Campwich Forest.
  • Meetings are open to anyone with a concern / interest in the above topics, and form one of a series of regular / semi-regular User Group meetings conducted by Linden Lab.
  • Dates and times of all current meetings can be found on the Second Life Public Calendar, and descriptions of meetings are defined on the SL wiki.

Resources

Current Releases

SL Mobile (Beta) version 2025.1065 (A) / 0.1.1065 (iOS) – October 20.

Updates:

  • Fixed a bug with object loading
  • Added a new 25m draw distance option (Menu > Settings > General > Max Draw Distance) – default is 40m.
    • There have been some reports of this resetting to the default if 25m is set, and then another application is opened on a device. This is under investigation.
  • Improved framerate on lower-end devices
  • Rendering resolution now adjusted on the fly to keep things running smoothly. The app looks at your framerate over the last 10 seconds and automatically lower or raise resolution to maintain at least 20fps (or 80% of your framerate cap, whichever is higher). You might notice a short dip when loading new areas, but it quickly recovers.
  • Added a new “unloader framework” that decides which items should be temporarily removed if the system runs low on memory. Instead of deleting them, it safely suspends them so they can return once memory becomes available again.
  • A performance index now estimates your device’s power using real-world benchmarks. Default settings—like draw distance (how far you can see) and max avatars (how many avatars are shown) —automatically scale to fit your device’s capabilities.

Performance Updates

[Video: 2:06-5:58]

  • The initial October update (560) caused a performance regression on some Android devices, prompting further releases during the month with a focus on re-upping the performance on “lower-end Android devices” (although this in itself covers a wide spectrum of hardware and devices due to the way various devices might be configured by the manufacturer to prioritise things like battery life).
    • The biggest change in this regard is that the the rendering resolution is based on frame rate when initially loading a scene, the idea again being to speed-up the load time.
    • In addition, and again particularly with Android, changes were made to the number of rendering passes being made, together with some simplification within the shaders to again help boost performance.
    • Android testing indicated that these changes should hopefully see around a 20-25% performance boost for most of the affected hardware, which should help alleviate some of the pain users may have been feeling earlier in the month.
    • Those who did experience performance issues on the earlier October releases for Android are encouraged to try the October 20th release, and see if their issues have been resolved (and if not, to please provide feedback).
  • Additionally, changes have been made to how out-of-memory situations are handled.
    • Previously, if the app showed signs of running out of memory, it would attempt to start deleting content held in memory (but not necessarily seen on-screen) to try to stay ahead of the curve and prevent the entire app from crashing due to running out of memory.
    • However, any such content deleted from cache in this way was essentially “gone”; it could not be reloaded, even if the app had available memory to do so.
    • Changes at the start of October altered this behaviour to enable content to be automatically re-loaded, and this has all been synced-up withing the memory management code to make sure that content is reloaded as soon as there is memory available.

Upcoming Work: Texture Memory Use

[Video: 6:12-9:00]

  • For convenience “and a number of other factors” SL Mobile has been “pretty much” loading textures at one fixed resolution (with the exception of avatar textures). This means that the app does not take into consideration things like the size of an in-world object in order to determine a suitable texture resolution.
  • Work is now in-hand to switch-over to a new texture resolution mechanism which allows textures to be loaded at resolutions based on the surface area of an object (what LL is calling “variable textures”).
  • This also means larger objects will get more texture memory allocated to them, whilst very small objects (e.g. a ring, a button, etc.) will get loaded at the absolute lowest resolution.
  • The overall goal is to allocate available texture memory more efficiently than currently is the case, and allow for adjustments to texture memory to be made on the fly as an avatar / camera moves around a scene, with texture memory use changing as any particularly object gets re-sized larger or smaller within the scene.
  • Work on this has been in progress for the last couple of months, and is now a focus for the next beta release, and will be coming the Alpha version of the Mobile app for wider testing prior to release.
  • It is hoped that by carrying out this work, more memory will be made available for future use – such as
  • supporting PBR materials.

SL Mobile New Starter Experiences

[Video: 12:15-19:48]

  • Already available to those in the SL Mobile alpha programme are four new starter experiences, and soon to be released within the beta versions. Specifically developed in collaboration with various SL creators, these are intended to offer new users coming into SL via the Mobile app with high-quality experiences, intended to be “fast, social, photogenic, and touch-friendly” (that is, interactive).
  • The four experiences are:
    • Scaredycat’s Funhouse (by MadPea) – a gamified experience involving catching little kitties.
    • Midnight Pulse (by Bad Unicorn) – a nightclub-style experience.
    • Chronicles from the Backwaters (by Arcback / Altscape) – a “dark, gritty, interactive novel”.
    • The Mobile Learning Centre (by Second Life Studios) – designed to teach people how to move within and use the Mobile app.
  • These have been built as a result of insight gained during the continued development of SL Mobile (e.g.  because new users are looking for “snackable” experiences within the app to engage them), and have been informed by the manner in which people are using SL Mobile, together within its ouch-based UI, and things like the form factors of various mobile devices, and how people tend to use their mobile devices and apps in general (e.g. taking photos / selfies, creating shareable moments, etc.), and trying to lean into that kind of device usage.
  • New users coming into SL for the first time using SL Mobile will be able to select the experience that most interests them as a part of the join process.
  • Existing users will find the experiences can be accessed via the Lobby.
  • As these experiences become more widely available, the plan is to iterate upon them whilst also monitoring them for how they are used and the kind of metrics they produce in terms of engagement, re-use, popularity, etc.
  • The initial focus of this monitoring will be new user retention over the first 24 hours / first week, then expanding to look at month over month stickiness; if / when people make the move from Mobile to Desktop.
  • Alongside of this will be on-going monitoring of general performance within the different experiences and what improvements can be made to them / to SL Mobile as a whole.

Q&A Session

[Video 21:32-End]

  • Bring the Map to SL Mobile: while the web-based SL maps (maps.secondlife.com) have been made mobile device responsive, they have not been directly added to the SL Mobile app as yet as there is not a lot of utility in doing this at this point in time due to limited functionality within the web-based maps toolset.
  • Memory fragmentation:
    • Some users with multiple accounts (notably subscription accounts) have noticed decreasing SL Mobile loading performance when successively logging-on different accounts (e.g. working through the accounts each day to claim Streaks rewards).
    • This is caused in part by the way current versions of Unity work, which leaves small fragments of memory remaining marked as allocated unless an app is completed cleared from memory (swipe up) after use. These fragments then “break up” the larger pool of memory to eventually leave insufficient amounts of contiguous free memory available for other accounts to use when logging-in, thus increasing their load times.
    • It is believed that Unity 7 will offer a better garbage collector for clearing memory, thus preventing this kind of fragmentation from occurring, and this will become available when the SL Mobile is moved to this version of Unity at some point in the future.
    • For the time being, the easiest way to avoid the issue by those encountering it is to swipe up on logging-out of the app, thus removing it completely from memory, and then re-launching it to log-in on the next account (or, if using other apps at the same time, closing them and swiping up to remove them from memory, so as to prevent them causing fragmentation / using memory SL Mobile might otherwise access).
  • Localisation for SL Mobile in support of non-English speaking users is on the roadmap, but has yet to be scheduled as a tranche of work.

Date of Next Meeting

  • Check the SL Public calendar for details. At the time of writing, no meetings had been schedule for November or December.

2025 week #44: SUG meeting summary

Paradise Of Fantasy, August 2025 – blog post
The following notes were taken from the Tuesday, October 28th, 2025 Simulator User Group (SUG) meeting. These notes form a summary of the items discussed, and are not intended to be a full transcript. They were taken from the video recording by Pantera, embedded at the end of this summary – my thanks to Pantera for providing it.

Meeting Overview

  • The Simulator User Group (also referred to by its older name of Server User Group) exists to provide an opportunity for discussion about simulator technology, bugs, and feature ideas is held every other Tuesday at 12:00 noon, SLT (holidays, etc., allowing), per the Second Life Public Calendar.
  • The “SUG Leviathan Hour” meetings are held on the Tuesdays which do not have a formal SUG meeting, and are chaired by Leviathan Linden. They are more brainstorming / general discussion sessions.
  • Meetings are held in text in-world, at this location.

Simulator Deployments

  • On Tuesday, October 28th, the SLS Main channel was restarted without any deployment.
  • On Wednesday, October 29th:
    • The BlueSteel RC channel should be updated with a new simulator update (Imbu). This “has a couple of performance memory fixes in the simulator. It fixes an issue with region names that contain a ‘.”
    • The remaining RC channels will (I believe) be restarted without any update.

SLua Work

  • Harold Linden continues to work on the SLua implementation, focusing on some minor API changes, which he initially defined as: “just tons of lingering issues to file off sharp edges on APIs to make them do what people would reasonably expect.” Later in the meeting, he further expanded on the first of these changes thus:
I was looking to clear up one of the big warts of LSL: “keys” are not strictly UUIDs, they’re strings in disguise. That means the UUIDs that vary only in casing are considered unequal, which is very weird if you’re used to more modern UUID APIs. The only cases where people generally want that behaviour is in llMessageLinked() / ‘link_message()’ so you can pass an extra string as ‘id’, but it causes weird unexpected issues elsewhere. In SLua, I’d like to make ‘UUID()’ return nil if the passed-in string is not a valid UUID, like the existing Lua functions do, and make [the] ‘link_message()’ ID field just a string, because people mostly mash arbitrary strings in there. … All APIs that accept key or string in SLua are implicitly a union of ‘string | UUID’, and that doesn’t change. 
    • This approach was welcomed by the majority of scripters at the meeting.
    • As a part of this discussion, it was suggested that SL could benefit from an improved llMessageScript, such as llMessageScript(scriptname,data), and Harold Linden indicated that something like this is being planned.
  • The other API change Harold is working on is the removal of ‘integer()’, which he views as having been only a temporary requirement, but is now no longer needed as he has “fixed up all the bridges to existing LSL functions to tolerate a Lua number”. As such, he regards it as a nuisance to developers as it is likely to slow scripts and make them hard to optimise, as the Luau optimiser doesn’t know about it.
  • Harold also noted that he is not opposed to “adding stuff” to LSL on SLua (e.g. such as a table type), however, given the amount of foundational work that’s considered a higher priority, this is unlikely to happen soon (if at all).
    • Rider Linden also noted that such work would not be a small task, and as such, nothing is currently on the drawing board as yet.
  • Yardang, one of the SLua regions on Aditi has been down for possibly as long as a week. Rider Linden has requested that anyone testing SLua who notes any if the the associated regions appears to be down to contact him in-world.
  • Rider was engaged in a couple of technical debt projects over the course of the past week but is now now working on the official native VSCode plugin for LSL and SLua once more. The hope is to have this deployed in the upcoming week, although it will need further tweaking when the next version of the SLua project viewer is issued.
  • The first half of the meeting included a general discussion /catch-up on the above and related work, including:
    • The plugin should support linting (check a script for errors without running it) and also downloads the current language definition from the viewer and formats it so Luau-LSP and Selene can use it.
    • Wolfgang Senizen has also produced a VSCode plugin + documentation for use with SLua, although notes this will likely be discontinued when the official plugin is made available, and he will shift to contributing code to that project.
    • A note that LSL/SLua functions cannot be directly called from outside of the simulator (e.g. via a web page), but “in theory” it might be possible to create an RPC (bot) service of some kind to achieve the same.
    • Harold Linden reiterated that LL is working on a new LSL / SLua web portal, which will include documentation and code examples, etc.
  • The latter part of the meeting focused on suggestions for future SLua support, and discussions on the use of JSON / LLSD – please refer to the video for details.

In Brief

  • Harold and Leviathan Linden have been working on fixes for script scheduling (“do with have to do anything for this script / are we allowed to run it?”), and which should reduce script times on a simulator “a reasonable amount”.
  • Additionally, Leviathan Linden is working on fixing more memory leaks within the simulator code, noting that those fixed in the upcoming Imbu release are “small potatoes” compared to what the Lab thinks is out there.
  • Leviathan is also hoping to get back to the game_control work in the the near(ish) future, noting, “I have a link to the Linux viewer branch (which is almost deliverable) and I will be building on top of that”.
  • Given the lateness of the year and the limited time for further simulator updates, it is unlikely there will be further work on region crossings during 2025.

Date of Next Meetings

  • Leviathan Linden: Tuesday, November 4th, 2025.
  • Formal SUG meeting: Tuesday, November 11th, 2025.

† The header images included in these summaries are not intended to represent anything discussed at the meetings; they are simply here to avoid a repeated image of a rooftop of people every week. They are taken from my list of region visits, with a link to the post for those interested.

2025 week #43: SL Open Source User Group meeting summary

Oscarton Forest Park, August 2025 – blog post

The following notes were taken from my chat transcript + the video recording by Pantera (embedded at the end of this summary) of the Open Source User Group (OSUG) held on Friday, October 24th, 2025. My thanks to Pantera as always for providing it.

Meeting Purpose

  • The OSUG meeting is a combining of the former Third Party Viewer Developer meeting and the Open Source Development meetings. It is open discussion of Second Life development, including but not limited to open source contributions, third-party viewer development and policy, and current open source programs.
  • This meeting is generally held twice a month on a Friday, at 13:00 SLT at the Hippotropolis Theatre.
  • Dates and times are recorded in the SL Public Calendar, and they are generally conducted in text chat.
  • The notes herein are a summary of topics discussed and are not intended to be a full transcript of the meeting.

Official Viewers

  • Default viewer 2025.07 7.2.2.18475198968 – Apple Silicon Support – dated October 16 –  No Change.
    • This viewer now ships as a “Universal Binary” that contains both the Intel and Apple Silicon versions of the viewer. It should give performance gains on the Apple Silicon version in particular.
    • Also includes various WebRTC improvements and bug and crash fixes.
    • Known issues:
      • This version does not support convex decomposition for physics meshes with Apple Silicon. This will be hopefully be corrected in a future update or release, possibly with the help of a code contribution.
      • Navigation buttons in the in-viewer browser are no longer present for marketplace and search – these will be restored in a future update.
      • Apple Silicon does not support pathfinding tools.
      • Subtle rendering differences might be noticed on certain configurations and EEP environments.
    • Github Changelog.
  • Second Life Project Lua Editor Alpha (Aditi only), version 7.1.12.14888088240, May 13 –  No Change.

Viewer Updates

  • 2025.07 has seen an uptick in crash rates as a result of some WebRTC changes, and LL is working to resolve this. As such, TPVs looking to ship WebRTC / updates are advised to keep an eye on the Develop branch for relevant commits to integrate into their viewers if they would prefer to avoid the 2025.07 issues.
    • As apart of the overall WebRTC project, a server-side update is anticipated as being ready for release in the next 1 to 2 weeks, with fixes for some issues and some new features.
  • Viewer 2025.08 will be a maintenance update with a focus on resolving crash issues, with the hope it may also include some log-in time improvements for those with very large inventories.
  • Work is progressing on a contributed Linux update, details in this Github PR, which LL is hoping to “land” this year.
  • A new SLua project viewer is in the works. This should include Rider Linden’s work on an official native VSCode plugin for LSL and SLua, as noted in my more recent Simulator User Group meeting summaries.

In Brief

Please refer to the video for the following:

  • A general discussion on the viewer UI and making it easier for new users to quickly discover how to mute those using Voice in order to be obnoxious / harass, without necessarily requiring guidance from a mentor / friend on how to do so.
    • The above also broadened into a more general conversation on improving the chat functionality in the viewer in general (e.g. Voice controls + the conversations floater, etc.).
    • Also touched on was the on-going work with Project Zero (viewer in a browser) to reconstruct the viewer UI (or elements thereof) with a HTML/React-style approach – although this is being done without any intent to “break” the existing UI approach within the viewer.
    • As Geenz Linden noted (and the meeting chat demonstrated), views on the viewer UI and things like the conversations / chat floaters (or CHUI – Conversation Hub User Interface, to use the terms employed when the overhaul Viewer 2 chat UI was first introduced back in 2011) tend to be highly subjective when opinions are voiced. As such the suggestion was made to use the Feedback Portal to offer feature requests on what might be done to improve text chat & its UI elements (and Voice chat), and to upvote features thought to be worthwhile.
  • The second half of the meeting included a lot of general discussion on what might be done to “improve” the viewer experience in general, together with a side discussion between Geenz Linden and Henri Beauchamp on the alpha-gamma fix for legacy objects rendering by PBR + improving the appearance of water on PBR rendering.
    • A very short-form summary of these latter two items is to note server-side work is required for the alpha-gamma fix, but is currently stalled, whilst water is awaiting the updates to SSR (screen space reflections), which has yet to be prioritised for a future viewer release.

Next Meeting

† The header images included in these summaries are not intended to represent anything discussed at the meetings; they are simply here to avoid a repeated image of a gathering of people every week. They are taken from my list of region visits, with a link to the post for those interested.