Nitroglobus Roof Gallery, January 2026: Flossy Nova – Colour of Vulnerability
As I recently noted, there are two exhibitions kicking-off 2026 at Nitroglobus Roof Gallery, operated and curated by Dido Haas. The first – and slightly longer-running in terms of opening date – is by Sydney Couerblanc, as I covered that within Afterimages of Spring at Nitroglobus in Second Life.
The second exhibition, occupying the main hall of the gallery is The Colour of Vulnerability, a striking exhibition of work by Flossy Nova (flo0owl). Like Sydney’s exhibition in the gallery’s Annex, this is a collection of pieces rich in emotive content, but one very different in style to Sydney’s use of narrative as a connecting theme between the images.
Nitroglobus Roof Gallery, January 2026: Flossy Nova – Colour of Vulnerability
Colour is often used to describe mood and emotion, and in some ways this is very much the case within The Colour of Vulnerability; however, through her use of bold, strong colours Flossy not only offers suggestions of mood, but also of self; an expression of state-of-mind when placed within a virtual realm such as Second Life and the freedoms that come with it.
The nineteen images comprising the exhibition border on the abstract in terms of their use of colour, whilst encompassing silhouette-like elements for her avatar; the two combining into a series of expressionist piece which captivate the eye completely. Rather than carrying a narrative thread, each of these images stands on its own; the unifying element being the use of colour.
Nitroglobus Roof Gallery, January 2026: Flossy Nova – Colour of Vulnerability
The colours serve as both backdrops and as expression of mood, whilst also in some suggesting the very aura of life and emotion surrounding the figure they contain. Throughout all of them, Flossy reveals suggestions of both her mood and being in a manner which is both subtle and yet clearly declarative; a fusion of expressiveness matching the interplay of colour and silhouettes.
However we interpret each piece is a matter of personal response and mood. Clues might be found within the titles the artist has given to each work, however I would suggest allowing them to speak to you prior to taking and edit-peek at any of the titles.
Nitroglobus Roof Gallery, January 2026: Flossy Nova – Colour of Vulnerability
A visually engaging exhibition, layered with emotional meaning and reflection.
The following notes were taken from the Tuesday, January 20th, 2026 Simulator User Group (SUG) meeting. These notes form a summary of the items discussed, and are not intended to be a full transcript. They were taken from the video recording by Pantera, embedded at the end of this summary – my thanks to Pantera for providing it.
Meeting Overview
The Simulator User Group (also referred to by its older name of Server User Group) exists to provide an opportunity for discussion about simulator technology, bugs, and feature ideas is held every other Tuesday at 12:00 noon, SLT (holidays, etc., allowing), per the Second Life Public Calendar.
The “SUG Leviathan Hour” meetings are held on the Tuesdays which do not have a formal SUG meeting, and are chaired by Leviathan Linden. They are more brainstorming / general discussion sessions.
Meetings are held in text in-world, at this location.
Simulator Deployments
All simhosts are undergoing restarts this week, with no deployments.
The next simulator release – 2026.01 (Kiwi) is currently with QA.
The simulator release to follow that – 2026.02 – has been given the code-name of Loganberry, but it’s too early in development for details to be provided.
Game Control
Leviathan Linden had planned to try to get a project viewer branch put together for his game_control work, but has been sidetracked in dealing with issues with the Kiwi simulator code.
He still hopes to be able to cut that branch “on the side” and see if he can create an installable that can be used to check to see if the game_control code actually works with the port to the current viewer code branch.
Grid-Wide WebRTC Deployment Announcement
As per the most recent OSD meeting, LL is hoping to deploy WebRTC grid-wide in March 2026.
This is not a set-in-stone target, and further updates will be made.
This means that Vivox, whilst still being held in reserve, will no longer be available as a Voice service – so those using Voice and using a non-PBR / WebRTC viewer will need to update.
The Lab is currently looking at a March deployment of WebRTC voice across the grid.
The public beta for WebRTC has expanded – see this official blog post for details – and Roxie Linden and her team hope the beta expansion will provide more feedback from users on voice quality, voice stability, etc.
Transcription using WebRTC is being poked at by the Lab, but will not be a part of the initial deployment.
SLua Work
Harold Linden has a rough draft on how `require()` has to behave to make sense both in VSCode and in-viewer. This is very much a work-in-progress.
In short: if you’ve ever had to edit someone’s preprocessed LSL script without all the #includes they had on their disk, and had to wade into the generated code + //#line comment soup, this should be a more readable way to bundle together all the code so editing is nicer.
This prompted a series of question on the documentation – please refer to the video.
Having the include/require path include object inventory for scripts in objects was noted as future work.
A new SLua editor will be available with upcoming viewers which should have much faster script editing.
Rider Linden indicated he would like to add something to the VSCode plugin that would provide access to scripts in inventory – and noting a concern in giving anything automated access of any kind to agent inventory.
SLua Resources
The nine beta test regions are centred on SLua Beta Void (mind the water!).
It is not yet available on the VScode marketplace.
Issues and PRs for code submissions can be made here, and the plugin downloaded.
VSCode plugin + documentation (Wolfgang Senizen – likely be discontinued and contributions shifted to support the official documentation).
In Brief
Please also refer to the video, below.
Monty Linden indicated the annual simhost certification work is now in progress. Overall, very little is changing, so no problems are anticipated.
The new certifications are being used by the 2026.01 code running on the release test regions on Aditi (the beta grid).
Monty plans to automate the recertification later in 2026, and the certification will change slightly at that time.
A request was made to allow scripts to exchange messages (or streams of messages) with the viewer using by using llOwnerSay (sending towards viewer), and listen on certain channel (receiving from viewer) but directly without a listen.
Apparently a feature request for this is in development for submission to Firestorm.
Rider Liden expressed an interest in seeing that request once written.
This also sparked a discussion on how llOwnerSay works across region boundaries (e.g. with the help of child agents).
A general discussion on Drawer Distance and how to extend it beyond 1024 metres (e.g. via anchoring the camera in a region and flycamming to another and anchoring there – or by using a 3D Mouse such as SpaceNavigator – my preferred choice).
† The header images included in these summaries are not intended to represent anything discussed at the meetings; they are simply here to avoid a repeated image of a rooftop of people every week. They are taken from my list of region visits, with a link to the post for those interested.
Jade Koltai: Inis Oírr, January 2026 – click any image for full size
Sitting on the mouth of Galway Bay on the west coast of Ireland, are the three Oileáin Árann, the Islands of Aran. Comprising three core isles – Inishmore, Inishmaan and Inisheer, together with a number of small islets, the Arans are not a large grouping; the three main isles provide just 46 square kilometres of land mass between them. However, they carry a history of human habitation going back to around 1100 BC.
Between them, the islands have seen their fair share of history, including Cromwell’s forces stomping around the islands and building multiple churches (among other things), and in being folded into the Nine Years War (1688-1697), with Irish-born privateer Thomas Vaughan, working for the French, seized the islands for a brief period after a series on initial raids on the settlements there.
Jade Koltai: Inis Oírr, January 2026
Of the three islands, Inis Oírr – to give Innisheer its Irish name – is the southerly. Covering just 1,448 acres, it is actually the island with the second highest population count for the Arans (343 as of 2022). Its small size makes it an ideal inspiration for a region build in Second Life – and that is exactly what Jade Koltai has done in order to create her latest region design at Overland Hills, and which she calls, appropriately enough, Inis Oírr.
Of course, even trying to capture 1,448 acres in a single region is no easy task, so Jade has once again sought to capture the spirit of Innisheer, focusing on offering representations of the island’s more notable landmarks and locations. And in my opinion, she more than succeeds. The design captures much of its namesake whilst offering a unique setting in its own right.
Jade Koltai: Inis Oírr, January 2026
Chief among the latter are the Innisheer Lighthouse, completed in 1857 and located on the southern tip of the island; Teampall Chaomháin, the ruins of a church dedicated to the island’s patron saint, Chaomháin of Innisheer, and a representation of the MV Plassy. Despite being the “most celebrated of all the saints of the Aran islands”, little is actually known about Chaomháin, but the church dedicated to him lies within the cemetery on Innisheer, and which today looks more like an excavation than a church , something Jade has neatly reproduced.
The MV Plassy is very much a part of the island’s more recent history. Originally built as an armed anti-submarine trawler for the Royal Navy, the vessel was originally names Juliet (as in Romeo and Juliet, the ship and her sister vessels all being named for Shakespearian characters).
Jade Koltai: Inis Oírr, January 2026
The ship saw service in World War Two, prior to being sold-off and renamed the Peterjon prior to again being renamed Plassy in 1951, and working as a coastal freighter. In 1960, a storm drove the ship onto Finnis Rock off the coast of the island, with the entire crew rescued by the islanders. A second storm then beached the wreck up on the rocky shore of Innisheer, where it remains to this day (perhaps gaining wider fame via a certain British-Irish sitcom of the mid-to-late 1990s).
Jade’s build wisely steers away from trying to present the island’s local community (although the Landing Point does take the form of a harbour wharf), instead concentrating on the above and other historical details, such as what might be seen as the ruin of one of the churches built by Cromwell – or perhaps a reference to O’Brien’s Castle, built in the 1300s.
Jade Koltai: Inis Oírr, January 2026
There are also dry stone walls snaking across the rugged landscape, just as can be found across Innisheer, whilst a part of the landscaping of the coast might be taken as referencing the island’s limestone pavement. Even the island’s connection to Ireland gets a mention: at the landing point is a sign for the Doolin Ferry, which connects the Aran Islands with the settlement of Doolin, County Clare, to the south-east of the group – and indeed, a ferry is docked at the wharf.
The offshore region surround elements might be a little too mountain-like in places to represent the Galway / Clare coastline or Innismaan (Inis Meáin), the second largest of the three main islands, but this hardly matters; the presence of the elements help to give Jade’s Inis Oírr a further sense of place.
Jade Koltai: Inis Oírr, January 2026
When visiting, do have local sounds enabled for a more immersive feel, and do note also that the shared environment is a little on the gloomy side (well, it is winter and this is the Irish Sea, and nature is hardly sunny a gay this time of year!).
It is because of this, I opted to make some adjustments to lighting when taken my photographs, and then overly this with shots using the actual EEP settings for the region as a part of post-processing. Hopefully, this helps bring out some of the details more clearly.
Nitroglobus Roof Gallery, January 2026: Sydney Couerblanc – Afterimages of Spring
Currently being hosted at Nitroglobus Roof Gallery, operated and curated by Dido Haas, are two exhibitions which are very different in tone and style, but which both draw on us emotionally. Over this and a forthcoming piece, I will be covering both, starting with the longer-running of the two.
Located within the Annex at Nitroglobus is an exhibition by Sydney Couerblanc – a Second Life photographer whose work I don’t believe I’ve previously encountered. Afterimages of Spring presents a series of images captured within the ever-engaging Bella’s Lullaby, a place I have been known to frequent and have written about on numerous occasions. For me, this would usually be enough to encourage a visit to an exhibition; however, Afterimages of Spring presents two further attractions: Sydney’s use of black and white photography, together with the fact that these images are not intended to present the beauty of Bella’s lullaby per se, but rather they use the region to present a story, one that might be seen as part of a larger narrative, given the questions it spurs.
Nitroglobus Roof Gallery, January 2026: Sydney Couerblanc – Afterimages of Spring
Spring is ending. It is her last day as light keeper on Blackheart Key. She took the job as a desperate attempt to get away. From the city, from the ex, from herself. Although challenging at first, she found solace in the island, and in time came to call it home. Today, with departure upon her, she misses it already.
– Artist’s statement on Afterimages of Spring
So it is that we join this unnamed light-keeper on the island carrying a name that is the negative (so to speak in photographic terms, that is) of the artist’s, as she travels through her final day at this remote location. Through eleven carefully framed and beautifully executed images, we follow her day from rising, through a final round of tasks to a final farewell, the island apparently seen from aboard a departing vessel.
The unfolding story is heavy in latent emotions, which follow outwards from each image: sadness at a forthcoming departure; apprehension at what now lay head; heart-tugging final times with friends soon to be left behind, and more. Through her framing and the gifted use of focus and depth of field combined with the sharpness , and black and white itself, Sydney conveys her story perfectly.
Nitroglobus Roof Gallery, January 2026: Sydney Couerblanc – Afterimages of Spring
In this, I particularly like Sydney’s use of the lighthouse itself in the majority of her pictures. It is present in nine of the eleven images, generally in the background and in a soft focus. This gives the lighthouse a sense of being; it is not so much a structure designed to fulfil a function – it is a friend; a guardian, a comforting presence keeping a companionable watch on our light keeper without making demands or overshadowing her life and thoughts.
Then there is the broader story hinted at both through the artist’s statement and the idea of the light keeper now leaving this sanctuary she has lived within: what did happen to her city life, her ex – perhaps even her career? – to cause her to seek such remote a withdrawal in the first place? And what now that she is departing – what will see discover or encounter? How will she fair? Might she yet have cause return?
Nitroglobus Roof Gallery, January 2026: Sydney Couerblanc – Afterimages of Spring
These are questions Afterimages of Spring perhaps stirs – but does not seek to answer. Like all skilled storytellers, Sydney presents enough to provide her core story, then leaves the rest to our imaginations.
Please note that this is not a full transcript of either meeting but a summary of key topics.
Meeting Purpose
The CCUG meeting is for discussion of work related to content creation in Second Life, including current and upcoming LL projects, and encompasses requests or comments from the community, together with related viewer development work.
This meeting is generally held on alternate Thursdays at Hippotropolis and is held in a mix of Voice and text chat.
The OSUG meeting is a combining of the former Third Party Viewer Developer meeting and the Open Source Development meetings. It is open discussion of Second Life development, including but not limited to open source contributions, third-party viewer development and policy, and current open source programs.
This meeting is generally held twice a month on a Friday, at 13:00 SLT at the Hippotropolis Theatre and is generally text chat only.
Default viewer 2025.08 – 7.2.3.19375695301 – maintenance update with bug fixes and quality of life improvements – December 2 – No Change.
Notable addition: new VHACD-based convex decomposition library for mesh uploads.
Second Life Project Lua Editor Alpha version 7.2.3.19911032641, December 5 – No Change.
Second Life Project Voice Moderation viewer 26.1.0.20139269477, December 12 – No Change.
Introduces the ability to moderate spatial voice chat in regions configured to use webRTC voice.
Upcoming Viewers
Viewer 2026.01 – One-click Installer / Updater
Viewer 2026.01 is in progress. This will include:
Improved bugsplat support (we want better reporting for freezes, and just generally better crash reporting). This work builds on the successes of 2025 in detailing with viewer crashes and reducing overall causes for crashes.
A new one-click installer, which in brief:
Will be powered by a new dependency called velopack, and will allow a single-click installation of the viewer (with a brief pop-up message), with the viewer launching once the install process is complete.
Will default to installing under Apps/Local on windows; will remain as a drag-and-drop process on Mac OS, while Linux is currently TBD. It will still be possible to install the viewer to a custom location, initially via a command line argument.
Will not change the install location of config files, or anything that counts as user data.
Development work on this did hit a delay, which has now been cleared, the hope remaining to get an Alpha (previously known as Project) viewer out with the update code in place sooner rather than later.
As an added benefit to the switch to velopack for TPVs, LL will be providing a solution to add auto-update functionality to TPV projects, if TPVs wish to leverage it. More information on this is due to be made available in the next week or so.
Viewer 2026.02 – “Flat” UI, Font Changes
This viewer is to be part of the Lab’s “first impressions” push to make SL resonate more with incoming new users and hopefully encourage them to keep logging in.
This first impression work is on multiple fronts, and for the 2026.02 viewer will be a switch to the “flat” UI seen in the Project Zero (viewer in a browser) version which comprises things like a font change, a colour scheme change, and generally giving the viewer a more “modern” look and feel.
The font update:
Should not impact people’s use of unicode.
Will require XUI updates which will likely require updates for TPVs using their own custom XUI – TPVs are advised to keep an eye on Discord and Github for more information on these changes as they develop, and to particularly track this github issue.
General Viewer Notes
Linux support will likely ship as a part of the in-progress SLua beta viewer.
The viewer development roadmap is still being worked on in terms of fixes and updates and actioning feature requests, the focus being to work these into the viewer without disrupting major initiatives the Lab is looking to develop (such as the “first impressions” drive).
2026.02 might include some screen space reflections (SSR) updates to help improve the appearance of Linden Water under PDR/HDR.
The avatar appearance fixes contributed by Kitty Barnett and intended to make the current outfit folder more reliable when changing outfits, messing with outfits, etc., may get to see the light of day in viewer 2026.03 – but this had yet to be confirmed.
The Lab is currently looking at a March deployment of WebRTC voice across the grid.
The schedule is not firmly set as yet, but will follow the usual server-side deployment routine: first to one (or more) simulator RC channels, then to all simulator RC channels (if not all rolled at once), and then a week after this, deployment to the Main simulator channel.
The important point in this is that once grid-wide, WebRTC will completely supplant Vivox Voice, and those who use Voice by who are not running a WebRTC voice capable viewer (which generally means anyone not on a non-PBR supporting viewer) will be unable to use Voice.
This does not mean that the Vivox service will be immediately shut-down. It will remain an option for the Lab to re-enable until such time as LL is confident in the WebRTC service and no surprises have come to light.
There is one remaining WebRTC critical issue in the viewer that makes the experience not great for a small body of users:
People with certain network characteristics may see a dropout because the WebRTC provider is not properly handling renegotiation.
LL has a fix which should be deployed with viewer 2026.01. However, TPVs wishing to merge it now can do so via Pull Request 5126.
In the meantime, the beta for WebRTC has expanded – see this official blog post for details.
Roxie Linden also indicated that LL is experimenting with speech-to-text using WebRTC, but does not as yet have anything available for public demonstrations.
The issue of Linux builds not using Pulseaudio but with the WebRTC code crashing on start-up was reiterated at the meeting. Whilst this might not be a widespread issue, the feeling was that it should be looked at; however, if the pool of impacted users is liable to be very small, it will not be seen as a reason to block / delay WebRTC deployment as a whole and any fix is liable to be prioritised in terms of resources / impact of the issue, post-deployment.
General Discussion – Both Meetings
Avatar support related:
Shape key support and / or custom bone hierarchies – seen as complex area of work, and not being looked at.
While the current avatar does technically use shape keys, it is very different to how modern blend shapes are used.
Questions were raised on the status of game_control. This is more a subject for the Simulator User Group meetings, where Leviathan Linden indicated he was trying to resume work on the code. However, it was also indicated during this meeting that Leviathan had again been “borrowed” to work on other code.
Despite rumour to the contrary, Puppetry is not currently set for revival or on the current 2026 roadmap.
Geenz noted that while work on things like new tools, updates to the GLTF uploader, etc., are not “done”, the focus for the time being in more on dealing with technical debt together with the aforementioned “first impressions” initiative, etc.
Questions were asked on auto / planar-aligning PBR materials – see: Aligning Faces when using PBR and Planar face alignment with PBR GLTF materials. This is something the Lab has yet to resolve, and has offered a contribution bounty for any developer who is able to provide a solution. Geenz also indicated he would try to get bugs like this better prioritised.
A general discussion on ideas for improvements to chat, including: ability to have a “last unread” indicator in chat when logging-on; having the chat rings on the mini-Map on by default, some idea about a special chat tab that would allow region-wide chat (presumably at the region owner’s discretion to enable), ability to correct text in chat / IM after sending(!), etc.
The You Tube embedding issues was again raised (see here for more), with a possible (if hacky) workaround. LL are looking to You tube to address the problem, as they created it.
There was a general discussion on the complexities of Land Impact, particularly – but not restricted to – mesh objects. In short, LI is a complicated subject, and not easily addressed; hence why the Lab backed away from the subject recently. This also strayed into the equally complicated realm of LOD generation.
On the subject of LOD generation, it was suggested that the Lab should look to implement a LOD generator and then inform creators LODs have to be generated to fit a defined set of criteria – or defaults will be forced.
A discussion on the choice of VHACD over HACD as a replacement for Havok in mesh decomposition. The latter is seen as more mature, but LL opted for VHACD is a “middle ground” solution as it is more regularly maintained, it is also apparently more reliable when dealing with the “weirder meshes” some SL creators produce, when compared to something like CoACD. However, Geenz indicated it would be “nice” to have “swappable” convex decomposition solutions at runtime.
The following notes cover the key points from the Web User Group (WUG) meeting, held on Wednesday January 14th, 2025. These notes form a summary of the items discussed and is not intended to be a full transcript. Pantera’s video is embedded at the end of this article, my thanks to her for providing it.
Meeting Overview
The Web User Group exists to provide an opportunity for discussion on Second Life web properties and their related functionalities / features. This includes, but is not limited to: the Marketplace, pages surfaced through the secondlife.com dashboard; the available portals (land, support, etc), and the forums.
As a rule, these meetings are conducted:
On the first Wednesday of the month and 14:00 SLT.
Meetings are open to anyone with a concern / interest in the above topics, and form one of a series of regular / semi-regular User Group meetings conducted by Linden Lab.
Dates and times of all current meetings can be found on the Second Life Public Calendar, and descriptions of meetings are defined on the SL wiki.
Updates
The past month hasn’t been very active for the web team due to the holiday season. There has been a focus on internal updates, security patching, and clean up.
Some of the above include:
Additional security features around marketplace to increase security and add resilience.
Version upgrades to LL’s internal services for security upgrades.
Upcoming security feature to nudge residents to update and verify their email address on file.
There is also something of a focus on trying to clear-up outstanding Canny issues (so maybe this and this will get addressed?).
There is a hope that the focus on back-end services, whilst not necessarily visible to users will this help to see the overall experience of using the Marketplace, etc., become far smoother with fewer outages, issues with people being overcharged for product listing enhancements (PLEs), etc.
A significant push for 2026 will be “first impressions” / the new user experience -trying to further improve things so that incoming users have a generally positive experience which encourages them to keep logging-in.
In Brief
Kali Linden departed the Lab around the end of November / beginning of December to become VP of system security at a new start-up. Many thanks to her in absentia for all her work a LL.
As a result of this, the Lab’s web engineering are operating on a “shared ownership” basis until someone can be hired-in to fill Kali’s role.
Kali’s departure also means that some of the planned roadmap for web properties (e.g. the Marketplace UI overhaul) are being reassessed in terms of what can / should be achieved, etc.
There have been reports of the SL forums running “slowly” for people in the UK (and Europe?). The Forums are operated by a third-party supplier, and somewhat outside of LL’s direct control. This has been escalated to the forum vendor, but not other updates at present.
A request was made to be able to transfer L$ amounts between accounts / to others via a user’s secondlife.com Dashboard – with suitable security in place.
This was seen as an “interesting” idea, but would likely require some additional security – such as being tied-into MFA.
No commitment was made towards implementing the idea at this time, because further investigation on requirements, etc., would be required.
A suggestion was made to set a limit on how much a user directly transfer – or allowing a user to set a limit on the amount (e.g. account-to-account, rather than via a vendor or similar system) at any one time, in order to safeguard accounts against being emptied if successfully hacked. This was also seen as potentially interesting, but could be a dynamic / fluid set of rules.
LindeX use, transaction fees, etc., came up for discussion (although perhaps better placed at the content Creation meeting, where people who routinely cash-out from SL are liable to be in attendance).
A loose consensus at the Web meeting was that greater clarification should be given as to what can be paid for directly using L$ / the USD wallet &without incurring additional processing fees (e.g. some users apparently think they have to convert L$ to dollars in order to pay their tier, etc.).
A clearer break down of the current transaction fees in a single place (buy for L$, credit processing for cashing-out, cost for subscribers, etc.) could perhaps be given within the Dashboard.
A discussion on SL maps – including searching by region name, improving World Map tile resolution, enhancing the map capabilities in general, etc.
A fair point was made that the maps are a core way of expressing the size and persistence of SL – yet the capability and the functions around it are perceived as being of little interest to LL management when it comes to prioritising updates, etc., with the focus appearing to be only on areas that directly affect commence in SL.
Maps are a vital component in the “first impression” aspect of Second Life – if incoming users can be encouraged to understand the SL is bigger than the welcome hubs and the selected destinations beyond them – and that they can, using the maps – explore on their own / in conjunction with the Destination Guide, then there is a motivation for them to keep logging-in and to start exploring.